Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day How Will We Ever Keep Up 英文参考文献.docVIP

Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day How Will We Ever Keep Up 英文参考文献.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day How Will We Ever Keep Up 英文参考文献

PolicyForum Seventy-FiveTrialsandElevenSystematicReviewsaDay: HowWillWeEverKeepUp? HildaBastian1*,PaulGlasziou2,IainChalmers3 1GermanInstituteforQualityandEfficiencyinHealthCare(IQWiG),Cologne,Germany,2CentreforResearchinEvidence-BasedPractice,FacultyofHealthSciences,Bond University,GoldCoast,Australia,3JamesLindLibrary,JamesLindInitiative,Oxford,UnitedKingdom Thirty years ago, and a quarter of a century after randomised trials had be- come widely accepted, Archie Cochrane SummaryPoints N When Archie Cochrane reproached the medical profession for not having reproachedthemedicalprofessionfornot having managed to organise a ‘‘critical summary, by speciality or subspeciality, adapted periodically, of all relevant ran- domised controlled trials’’ [1]. Thirty years after Cochrane’s reproach we feel itistimelytoconsidertheextenttowhich healthprofessionals,thepublicandpolicy- makers could now use ‘‘critical summa- ries’’oftrialsfortheirdecision-making. criticalsummariesofallrandomisedcontrolledtrials,about14reportsoftrials were being published per day. There are now 75 trials, and 11 systematic reviewsoftrials,perdayandaplateauingrowthhasnotyetbeenreached. N Althoughtrials,reviews,andhealthtechnologyassessmentshaveundoubtedly hadmajorimpacts,thestapleofmedicalliteraturesynthesisremainsthenon- systematic narrative review. Only a small minority of trial reports are being analysed in up-to-date systematic reviews. Given the constraints, Archie Cochrane’svisionwillnotbeachievedwithoutsomeseriouschangesincourse. N Tomeettheneedsofpatients,clinicians,andpolicymakers,unnecessarytrials needtobereduced,andsystematicreviewsneedtobeprioritised.Streamlining and innovation in methods of systematic reviewing are necessary to enable valid answers to be found for most patient questions. Finally, clinicians and patientsrequireopenaccesstotheseimportantresources. TheLandscape Keeping up with information in health care has never been easy. Even in 1753, whenJames Lindpublishedhislandmark

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1234554321 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档