Burden of proof in administrative proceedings study.docVIP

Burden of proof in administrative proceedings study Abstract: The three main procedural burden of proof is an important issue. Litigation around opposite sides strive to provide the relevant evidence, combined with the practice in favor of both parties to achieve the purpose, and constantly put forward new ideas, new evidence, constitutes a academic commentary and analysis of the burden of proof foundation of China’s current lt;lt;Administrative Procedure Lawgt;gt; the burden of proof on the defendant the provisions of a deep reflecting the focus of administrative litigation to protect individuals, organizations, administrative rights and the rule of law-oriented basic orientation. to be from start with the definition of the burden of proof, based on our social reality and legal environment, certainly lt;lt;Administrative Procedure Lawgt;gt; the burden of proof on the defendant is consistent with our present requirements, and focus on the burden of proof on the plaintiff a number of controversial issues . Keywords: burden of proof; objective burden of proof; subjective burden of proof An overview of the burden of proof 1.1 define the burden of proof Burden of proof is a proof system as well as an important part of litigation, the burden of proof on the definition of terms in a foreign country, the Anglo-American law of evidence will be categorized as the responsibility and burden of persuasion to promote so-called advance is the responsibility of the parties to provide evidence to prove their claims which constitute a legal dispute should be heard by the court or should the burden of proof. burden of persuasion refers to the parties to present evidence to a judge or jury to believe the body actually advocated the establishment of obligations, or inevitably suffer the referee. burden of proof in civil law countries generally divided into objective and subjective burden of proof so-called subjective burden refers to the parties on their claims to the