国内工科物理教材对比研究.docVIP

　　国内工科物理教材对比研究 国内工科物理教材对比研究 摘要：教材内容的改革和建设是新世纪物理教学改革的主要内容。然而纵观近些年内推出的工科物理教材，它们中的多数无论在内容体系，还是在教材的特色和结构以及其基础性内容与工程技术应用和高新科技发展等方面，很少明显突破，且普遍存在以下几个问题：物理教材内容大体相同，内容深化梯度不同；工科物理教材从教学上看，学时相差甚远；工科物理教材在教学目标和计划也有差异；教材难易程度也有区别。本文通过国内几套工科物理教材的对比研究，从前言，内容，插图，知识点，例题习题，适用性，可读性，可教性等方面的差异，寻找现行教材存在的问题如：内容陈旧，近代物理概念和方法没有得到应有的反映，与我国中学物理教育衔接不好，不少内容只是简单重复等。其次就是结合目前我校现行情况和我国人才培养的需要，对“21世纪”教材改革从合理性、系统性、新颖性、实际性、继承性、适用性、可教性、例题和习题的多功能性编写和印刷的精致性等方面提点建议。 关键词：工科物理；教材改革；对比研究；适用性；可教性 parative study on teaching Materials of Engineering physics at Home Abstract: The reform and construction of teaching materials’ contents is the principal content of reform on physical teaching reform in the neost of physical teaching materials of engineering are make fes, characteristics and structures as entary contents, application of engineering technology and development of advanced science. And they existing several problems in the folloaterials are more or less alike, and the gradient in deepening of contents is different. From teaching, there is a great deal of difference in class hours of physical teaching materials of engineering. It also existing differences in the plan and project of teaching for physical teaching materials of engineering. The degree of difficulty is also different. Based on the contrast of several sets of physical teaching materials of engineering, according to differences in preface, contents, illustrations, knoples and exercises, applicability, readability and teachability, looking for several problems in current teaching materials, for instance, the contents are staleness, and the concepts and methods of modern physical are outmoded, and the concepts and methods of modern physical aren’t reflected duly; it is not very good to join aterials of middle school in our country, and it is only easily repeated in some of contents. And on the basis of the current condition in our school and the demand of cultivation of students in our country, this paper also proposes some suggestions for the ref