二难推理2(国外英文资料).doc

二难推理2(国外英文资料) Two difficult reasoning 2 Correct use of two difficult reasoning ? Look at a legend, please: There was a king in ancient Greece who wanted to put a number of prisoners to death. The prevailing. There are two methods: one is beheaded, two is hanged. These two kinds of death can be chosen by prisoners. The alternative is to say a sentence at random before the death of the prisoner, and this sentence can be used to test the truth at once. If a prisoner is telling the truth, then hanged; if the prisoner told a lie, then beheaded. The results, some prisoners by telling the truth (including words) and the gallows; some prisoners for lying to the first body separation. One prisoner is very clever, when he chose death, he said such a sentence: I want to cut. The king was hard to deal with. Neither will he hanged, nor will he beheaded, then, had to let him go. Why did the king decide to set the prisoner free? Because when the king heard the prisoner said, I want to cut, in two difficult reasoning. What is two difficult reasoning? What is the two difficult reasoning? Two difficult reasoning is composed of two hypothetical judgment and a two leg as precondition of disjunctive judgment reasoning. It is a hypothetical disjunctive inference. Such as: If I take part in full-time sports training, it will affect the study of culture class; If I dont take part in all day sports training, it will affect the level of sports competition; Im going to participate in full-time sports training, or do not participate in full-time sports training; This is a two - hard reasoning. Two difficult reasoning is often used in argumentation. It is: one side of the discussion this paper proposes a two big premise, the other party either positive or negative which is one of the possible results will fall into a dilemma, in a dilemma. Two difficult reasoning can also be used to express the contradictory psychological state of the party. The example above shows the ambivalence of I want to