行政证据与刑事证据衔接规范研究——基于刑事诉讼法第52条第2款的分析.pdfVIP

手括科学2012年第 20 卷(第 6 期) • 657 • 行政证据与刑事证据衔接规范研究 一-基于刑事诉讼法第 52 条第 2 款的分析 杜磊事 [摘 要] {刑事诉讼法}(20口年)在第 52 条第 2 款规定了行政证据和刑事证据衔接适用规范。该规范 与以往的证据转化规则不同，是赋予行政证据以刑事证据能力的规范。对于等证据材料的理解，应当进行 严格解释，将勘验、检查笔录以及部分现场笔录涵盖进来，而现行司法解释及有关规定将其范围扩大到鉴定 意见、检验报告的做法是值得商榷的。在具体的适用过程中，审判机关是实质意义上的衔接适用主体，行政证 据无需转化就可以直接适用，对行政证据自身合法性的审查应当依据行政法律、法规进行，而刑事证据规则 也有其适用的空间。 {关键词]行政证据;刑事证据;证据材料;证据能力;证据衔接 [中图分类号] D918.9 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-1226(2012)06-0657-08 On the Convergence Norms between Administrative Evidence and Crimina] Evidence 二 on the Basis of Article52(2)in the 2012 Criminal Proceclure Law. Du Lei, Ph.D candidoJe, School 0/ Law, Renmin University 0/ China, 1ω872. [Abstract]ηle Criminal Proceclure Law (2012) sets up a new regulation to link up aclministrative eviclence and criminal evidence. However, this convergence norm , different from the previous evidence conversion rule , pro- vides the administrative evidence with the evidence competency Iike criminal evidence. We should take strict in- terpretations of other evidentiary materials including the writing records of inquisition and inspection and some part of on-the spot writing records. Wether or not expert opinion or inspection report can be included is question- able. In the judicial practice , the court is substantively the application subject. Administrative evidence can be di- rectly used without conversion. The legitimacy review of aclministrative evidence should be based on the aclminis- trative laws and regulations , and criminal evidence rules are also available to be used. [Key Words] Administrative evidence ,Criminal evidence.Evidential materials.C