1·1普通高等学校学生管理规定TITLE.docVIP

Internet Architecture CPS 214 (Nick Feamster) January 14, 2008 Today’s Reading Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols. Dave Clark, 1988. Conceptual Lessons Design principles/priorities were designed for a certain type of network. As the Internet evolves, we feel the sting of some of these choices.Examples: Commercialization Engineering/Realization is key to testing an idea. Technical Lessons Packet switching Fate Sharing/Soft state Fundamental Goal “technique for multiplexed utilization of existing interconnected networks” Multiplexing (sharing) Shared use of a single communications channel Existing networks (interconnection) Fundamental Goal: Sharing No connection setup Forwarding based on destination address in packet Efficient sharing of resources Type of Packet Switching: Datagrams Information for forwarding traffic is contained in destination address of packet No state established ahead of time (helps fate sharing) Basic building block Minimal assumption about network service An Age-Old Debate Resource control, accounting, ability to “pin” paths, etc. Stopping Unwanted Traffic is Hard Research: Stopping Unwanted Traffic Datagram networks: easy for anyone to send traffic to anyone else…even if they don’t want it! The Design Goals of Internet, v1 Interconnection/Multiplexing (packet switching) Resilience/Survivability (fate sharing) Heterogeneity Different types of services Different types of networks Distributed management Cost effectiveness Ease of attachment Accountability Fundamental Goal: Interconnection Need to interconnect many existing networks Hide underlying technology from applications Decisions: Network provides minimal functionality “Narrow waist” The “Curse of the Narrow Waist” IP over anything, anything over IP Has allowed for much innovation both above and below the IP layer of the stack An IP stack gets a device on the Internet Drawback: very difficult to make changes to IP But…people are trying NSF GENI project: / Interconnec