颈动脉血管分叉模型内流场分布的piv测量和数值模拟比较研究.docVIP

颈动脉血管分叉模型内流场分布的PIV测量和 数值模拟比较研究 于风旭1邓明彬1廖斌1石应康2△陈槐卿3李新1 1（泸州医学院附属医院心胸外科，泸州，646000）；2（四川大学华西医院心胸外科，成都610041）；3（四川大学基础与法医学院生物医学工程实验室，成都610041） 【摘要】目的：通过对比分析颈动脉血管分叉模型内流场分布的数值模拟计算和粒子成像测速article imaging velocimetry, PIV)法量的结果，为今后流场分布的描述选择相适应的方法提供科学依据。方法：分别应用数值模拟方法和PIV定量检测方法，对颈动脉血管分叉模型颈内动脉窦（internal carotid artery sinus，ICASThe comparison of the velocity profiles in carotid artery bifurcation model what were got by numerical simulation calculation and particle imaging velocimetry measurement respectively Yu Fengxu1 Deng Mingbin1 Liao Bin1Shi Yingkang2△Chen Huaiqing3 Li Xin1 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the Hospital affiliated to Luzhou Medical College, Luzhou Sichuan 646000. 2. Department of cardiovascular surgery, West China hospital. Chengdu, 610041. 3. Department of BiomedicaI Engineering. West China MedicaI Center, Sichuan University. Chengdu Sichuan, 610041. 【ABSTRACT】Objective:descriptive method through comparing the results got by numerical simulation and particle imaging velocimetry. Methods: Calculating the wall shear stress in internal carotid artery sinus of carotid artery bifurcation model by numerical simulation and particle imaging velocimetry method respectively. Results: The results were similar in the overall distribution of velocity profiles. But the area of low shear stress scope got by numerical simulation was smaller than what got by particle imaging velocimetry. And the absolute value of wall shear stress got by numerical simulation was larger than what got by particle imaging velocimetry. Conclusion: The numerical simulation was simple and convenient when just to image the distribution if local velocity profiles. But the particle imaging velocimetry was optimal when it needed to fully quantify the wall shear stress distribution. Key words: carotid artery, model, velocity profile, particle imaging velocimetry, numerical simulation, wall shear stress, 前言 在流场分布的描述方法中，目前常用的研究方法主要有PIV定量检测研究和数值模拟[1-3]。二者都有其本身固有的优缺点，为了为以后的研究提供研究方法选择的初步依据，