从《房屋租赁合同司法解释》第十七条论合同相对性突破.pdfVIP

中文摘要 合同相对性是各国合同立法和司法实践普遍坚持的一项合同法基本原则。随 着社会的发展，合同相对性在一些特殊的案件中面临理论和实践的困境。各国立 法和司法基于现实的考量，在坚持合同相对性的前提下，不同程度地在一些例外 情形承认合同相对性的突破。我国最高人民法院颁布的《关于审理城镇房屋租赁 合同纠纷案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》第十七条是合同相对性突破的新情 形，从社会现实、法的价值和租赁权物权化等方面进行论证，该司法解释对合同 相对性的突破具有正当性。合同相对性突破虽然有利于实现公平、正义，但可能 造成合同履行、司法适用的困境以及司法资源的浪费，合同相对性的突破应有相 应的边界。 关键词：合同相对性，突破，正当性，边界，租赁合同司法解释 I 万方数据 ABSTRACT Privity of contract , a fundamental principal of Contract Law and juridical practice in most countries, along with development of society, encounters some academic and practical difficulties of particular cases. In consideration of law enforcement, legislature of various nations makes exceptions to a certain degree on the premise that the above-mentioned principal remains fundamental. The Article 17 of Interpretation of the Supreme Peoples Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases about Disputes Over Lease Contracts on Urban Buildings, a new circumstance of privity of contract, in respect of social reality, legal value and the leasehold as a property right, is legitimate to a point. Exceptions of privity of contract is fair and just in some way, however, these could put performance of a contract or judicial application in a dilemma and squander judicial resource. It means that legislature should mark the exact boundary of exceptions of privity of contract Keywords ：Contract Privity ，Exception ，Legitimacy ，Boundary ，Judicial In