微平面模型及经典混凝土理论模型比较.docVIP

微平面模型及经典混凝土理论模型比较摘要： 针对在混凝土非线性分析时所采用的宏观本构模型中，没有考虑混凝土软化阶段或考虑不当，以及在多轴受力情况下宏观模型不能很好地模拟混凝土受力状态的问题，基于微平面理论，利用MATLAB编写混凝土材料的非线性本构关系程序，从理论和计算结果两方面与经典的基于应力张量及其不变量的本构模型进行比较. 比较结果表明，在弹性变形阶段，经典理论模型和微平面模型计算结果与试验结果无明显区别；在非弹性变形阶段，经典理论模型与微平面模型有较大的差异，后者与试验结果吻合较好. 微平面理论在混凝土三向受力和软化阶段更能准确地描述混凝土材料本构关系，且本构关系更简单、清晰. 关键词： 混凝土； 非线性分析； 微平面； 本构关系； 动态约束 中图分类号： TU313 文献标志码： A Comparison between microplane model and classical concrete theoretical model JU Jinxian, LU Hua, WANG Shuiping (Naval Representative Office, Shanghai Power Station Auxiliary Equipment Works Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200090, China) Abstract： As to the problems that the softening stage is not considered or considered unsuitable in nonlinear analysis of concrete by macroscopic constitutive model, and macroscopic constitutive model can not perform a good simulation on concrete stress states under multi-axial force-bearing situation, the nonlinear constitutive relationship program is fulfilled in MATLAB based on microplane theory. Then the theory and the computing results are compared with the classical constitutive model based on stress tensor and its invariant. The comparative results show that, there is no significant difference between the test results and the calculation results of classical theory model and the microplane model in elastic deformation stage; the difference is larger in non-elastic deformation stage, and the latter consists with the test results better. The constitutive relation of concrete material can be described more accurately in three direction force-bearing and softening stage, and the constitutive relation is more simple and clearer. Key words： concrete; nonlinear analysis; microplane; constitutive relation; dynamic constraint 0 引 言 混凝土是土木工程中应用最多、也是最重要的建筑材料之一.近年来，混凝土结构非线性分析变得日益重要，而非线性分析结果的正确与否则依赖于描述混凝土非线性性能的本构关系和破坏准则.迄今为止，已有的本构模型基本上分为两类［1-3］：(1)宏观现象学模型，包括非线性弹性模型、弹塑性模型、损伤力学模型和内蕴时间模型等，其本构关系用宏观连续介质中应力、应变张量及其不变量表示；(2)微观力学模型，包括微平面模型和粒子模型等，其本构关系用微观上的应力、应变关系表示.前者是经典方法，在混凝土本构模型的发展中发挥过巨大作用，但其发