从本案看公司法人人格否认诉讼（Viewing the lawsuit of disregard of corporate personality from the case）.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约4.66千字
约 4页
2017-08-15 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

从本案看公司法人人格否认诉讼（Viewing the lawsuit of disregard of corporate personality from the case）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

从本案看公司法人人格否认诉讼（Viewing the lawsuit of disregard of corporate personality from the case）

从本案看公司法人人格否认诉讼（Viewing the lawsuit of disregard of corporate personality from the case） Viewing the lawsuit of disregard of corporate personality from the case Author: Li Xiaorui release time: 2010-05-07 08:39:40 [case]: In February 2006, a Beijing lens care products Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Beijing company) due to contract dispute will be Changsha a glasses product Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Changsha Company) to court. In May, the Beijing company applied to the court for the addition of the Changsha Companys major shareholder and legal representative to the co defendant and assumed joint and several liabilities. The Beijing company said in the application submitted to the court additional defendants, which was found in the process of litigation by the shareholders of the Changsha Company Zhu its holdings of 80% shares, the company and its legal representative of the identity of the actual control of the Changsha Company, and will buy goods from Beijing company 90% transferred to the Shanghai Optical Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Shanghai sales company). The Changsha Company is only a nominal shipper, but it is actually a warehouse for the transit of goods, and the Shanghai company is the direct beneficiary. And Shanghais shareholders are Zhu and her husband, two, each holding 50%. Beijing company believes Zhu in the name of the Changsha Company in Changsha to purchase, and then transfer the assets of the Changsha Company of Shanghai company, and then in the Changsha disappeared, rental stores, the Changsha Company only a shell, even if the creditor is successful, it is difficult to get out. Therefore, in accordance with the provisions of article twentieth, paragraph 1 and third of the company law, an additional shareholder, Zhu, is co defendant in this case, who is jointly and severally liable for the foreign debts of the Changsha Company. In mid August 2006, due to the difficulty of proof, litigation costs and other issues, the