- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
右美托咪定对全麻患者i-gel喉罩插入时应激反应的-内科急危重症杂志
右美托咪定对全麻患者i-gel喉罩插入时应激反应的影响
李敏仙,顾颖红*
(海南医学院附属医院麻醉科 海南海口 570102)
摘要:目的:探讨右美托咪定对全麻患者i-gel喉罩插入时应激反应的影响。方法:择期行腹腔镜下手术患者120例根据随机抽签原则分为治疗组与对照组各60例,两组都给予喉罩插入下全麻,在麻醉诱导与维持期,治疗组给予右美托咪定辅助干预,对照给予同剂量生理盐水辅助干预。结果:两组的麻醉时间、呼吸恢复时间、呼之睁眼时间和拔出喉罩时间对比差异都无统计学意义(P0.05)。T1时间点治疗组的OAA/S评分与NI指数明显下降,与对照组对比差异明显(P0.05),与TO时间点对比差异也有统计学意义(P0.05),T2时间点及其以后两组NI值及OAA/S评分对比差异无统计学意义。治疗组的喉罩插入应激反应发生率为1.3%,对照组为10.0%,治疗组的喉罩插入应激反应发生率明显低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下全麻患者采用i-gel喉罩插入具有很好的麻醉效果,而右美托咪定的应用能增强镇静作用,减少应激反应的发生,为患者提供安全有效舒适的麻醉。
关键词:右美托咪定;腹腔镜;全麻;i-gel喉罩;应激反应
The stress response effects in the i-gel anesthesia laryngeal mask insertion on the anesthesia patients by the dexmedetomidine
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the stress response effects in the i-gel anesthesia laryngeal mask insertion on the anesthesia patients by the dexmedetomidine. Methods: 120 elective laparoscopic surgery patients based on the principle of a random draw were equally divided into the treatment group and the control group, both groups were given laryngeal mask insertion under general anesthesia, In the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the treatment group were given the dexmedetomidine aid intervention, and the control group were given the same dose of saline aid intervention. Results: The anesthesia time, recovery time breathing, eye opening and pull out the laryngeal mask and call time in the two groups compared the differences were not statistically significant (P0.05). In the T1 time, the OAA/ S scores and NI index in the treatment group were decreased significantly different compared with the control group (P0.05), and compared with the TO time were also statistically significant differences (P0.05), In the T2 time point, the OAA/ S scores and NI index in the two groups compared difference were not statistically significant. The laryngeal mask insertion stress response rate in the treatment group were 1.3%, so that were 10.0% in the control group, and the laryngeal mask insertion stress response rate in the treatment group were
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 《食品经营许可证》延续申请表.doc VIP
- 产教融合视角下的应用型高校微专业建设的探索与实践.docx VIP
- 【宏观专题】牛市进程:十大观察指标-250901-华创证券.pdf VIP
- IBM-中外运产品创新咨询项目IPD体系沟通材料_v1.0_20200228.pptx VIP
- 课件智慧管廊解决方案.pptx VIP
- 2024秋新人教版英语七年级上册课件 Starter Unit 2 Keep Tidy! Section B.pptx
- 油菜高产高效栽培技术详解演示文稿.ppt VIP
- 施工现场安全管理考核明细及罚款金额.doc
- 第5课 罗马城邦和罗马帝国 课件(共23张PPT).pptx VIP
- 血栓相关课件.pptx
文档评论(0)