基础物理学第五章(静电场)课后习题答案（Basic physics fifth chapters (electrostatic field) after-school Exercises answer）.docVIP

基础物理学第五章(静电场)课后习题答案（Basic physics fifth chapters (electrostatic field) after-school Exercises answer） The fifth chapter of fundamental physics (electrostatic field) after-school exercise answers.Txt there is no one like me in time to hear some songs suddenly thought of his own past _______ if I can return to the past, I will choose not to know you. Not I regret, is that I can not face the end without you. The fifth chapter, electrostatic field thinking 5-1 according to the formula of field intensity of point charge, when the distance between the point and the point charge is observed, the field strength is not physically significant. How to explain this problem? Answer: at that time, for the point of view, q is no point charge, and the field formula of point charge is no longer applicable What is the difference and connection between the 5-2 and the two formula? Answer: the front is the definition of electric field intensity (electrostatic field, motion charge electric field), and the latter is the electric field distribution generated by electrostatic point charge. In the electrostatic field, the front is a vector superposition of the latter, i.e., the intensity of the field at one point is the sum of the field strengths produced by all point charges. 5-3 if the electric flux of the closed surface S is zero, can it be sure that the field strength of each point on the surface S is equal to zero? Answer: can not. Through the closed surface S flux is zero, namely, only that the penetration through closed surface S power line as much, cant be closed throughout the area without power line penetration, piercing. As long as penetration and penetration, the field strength on the surface is not zero, so it can not be sure that the field strength of each point on the surface of the S is equal to zero. 5-4 if it is zero on the closed surface S, can it be certain that the closed surface does not enclose the net charge? Answer: yes. By Gausss theorem, E is everywhere zero, whic