原发性高血压病论文子午流注纳甲法论文:择时选穴针刺治疗高血压病肝阳上亢证临床观察.doc

原发性高血压病论文子午流注纳甲法论文:择时选穴针刺治疗高血压病肝阳上亢证临床观察.doc

  1. 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
原发性高血压病论文子午流注纳甲法论文:择时选穴针刺治疗高血压病肝阳上亢证临床观察

原发性高血压病论文子午流注纳甲法论文:择时选穴针刺治疗高血压病肝阳上亢证临床观察 【摘要】目的 :观察择时选穴治疗一、二级原发性高血压病的疗效。方法 :将60例一级或二级原发性高血压病患者随机分成2组,治疗组30例采用针刺子午流注纳甲法开穴为主穴,配穴曲池、太冲;对照组30例采用不同时辰针刺与当天治疗组相同的腧穴,每日1次,10次为1疗程,连续治疗两个疗程。结果:治疗前后临床积分:治疗组分别为7.70±0.87、 2.23±1.86, 对照组分别为7.66±0.92、 3.30±1.62, 两组治疗2疗程后与治疗前比较, 差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01);两疗程前后舒张压降低:两组均p<0.01),两组间比较,治疗组舒张压降低甚于对照组(p<0.01)。两疗程前后收缩压降低:两组均比治疗前降低(p<0.01),两组间比较,治疗组收缩压降低方面与对照组相当(p>0.05)。两疗程后,择时选穴组症状疗效优于同穴不同时组(p0.05)。两疗程后择时选穴组降压总疗效优于同穴不同时组(p0.01)。结论 : 择时选穴针刺治疗原发性高血压病肝阳上亢证效果良好,其可能是治疗原发性高血压病的一种简便可行的方法和手段。不同时间针刺相同穴位,对原发性高血压病的疗效具有明显差异,提示腧穴 【关键词】原发性高血压病 子午流注纳甲法 针刺 clinical observation on acupuncture treatment to hypertention of gan yang shang kang syndrome abstract】purpose : to observe the therapeutic effect of acupuncture according to zi wu liu zhu na jia theory to cure primary hypertention。 methods: 60 cases of patients with first or second grade primary hypertention were randomly divided into 2 groups.30 patients in the treatment group were treated by acupuncture according to zi wu liu zhu theory to cure hypertention;30 patients in the compared group were treated by the same acupoints in the same day but at a different time, once daily, with 10 days being one therapeutic course, and 2 courses all together.results: clinic score before and after treatment:treatment group: 7.70±0.8、 2.23±1.86;control group: 7.66±0.92、 3.30±1.62.compared with before and after two therapeutic courses treatment,the difference is statistically significant(p<0.01).compared between the two groups, treatment group’s clinlic score declining is better than the compared group(p<0.05).dbp declining: two groups’dbp both declined,both better than before(p<0.01),compared between the two groups,treatment group dbp declining is better than the compared group(p<0.01).sbp declining:two groups’ sbp both declined after two courses of treatment(p<0.01), compared between the two groups,the treatment group is not better than the compared group(p>0.05). after two periods of treatment,the efficient of treatment

文档评论(0)

pangzilva + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档