按生产条件分配是否是客观的(节选)（Is the allocation of production objective (excerpt)）.docVIP

按生产条件分配是否是客观的(节选)（Is the allocation of production objective (excerpt)） ...... No one will necessarily obtain the appropriate allocation because of the conditions of production they possess. A person occupies the physical production condition, people will not necessarily have the ability to work than just such a production conditions can get more social distribution -- this is not precisely that the principle of distribution of the production conditions, like labor force can not necessarily get to determine the distribution of the same. If according to the general view of social production, there is a trend of average rate of profit, it is only the people in the society in the dynamic process of constantly looking for the most suitable for their own market position, which in fact is a process of optimal control way direct personal practice on the production conditions. In other words, it is always a process of human behavior. ...... ...... If labor creates value, the society is not allocated according to work, but is distributed according to the conditions of production. This means that society does not evaluate labor itself, but only evaluate the share of production conditions in the hands of people, thus determining the proportion of such share to social value. So, capital can get average profit, workers can only be obtained to maintain their ability to work and make the working class as necessary number die life data. There is no doubt that the material productive conditions require compensation, but the profit and the human condition of production do not exist. This view of profit is contradictory! In this regard, Marxs explanation is that the profits of the production conditions of this material are formed only by the production conditions of the people employed as laborers, and the latter is precisely the former. So, everything is logical: the laborers are standing from belongs to the capitalist production conditions, and their machines are in the same position