北大数学系教授丁伟岳指丘成桐误导媒体（Peking University professor of mathematics Ding Weiyue Yau refers to misleading media）.docVIP

北大数学系教授丁伟岳指丘成桐误导媒体（Peking University professor of mathematics Ding Weiyue Yau refers to misleading media） Peking University professor of mathematics Ding Weiyue Qiu misleading media.Txt accountant said: you are late to wage, I have no change here. Can you see that Ive polished the powder? Although you wear some cologne, I can still vaguely smell a scumbag. Both house and rot, faces an uncertain future. Both house and rot, faces an uncertain future. You are after the end do you escape from the trash? The most mysterious department in the history: the relevant departments. There is no denying that mosaic is the biggest obstacle to the progress of human nude art in this century! Peking University professor of mathematics Ding Weiyue Yau refers to misleading media Time: 2006, 09, 14, 12:31 [source: Youth weekend] [Author: Zhang Qin] Photo / reporter Lv Jiazuo In June 3rd, Qiu Chengtong announced that Cao Huaidong and Zhu Xiping had completed the Poincare conjecture. In September 1st, a man named Ding Weiyue made another sound. The general view on international mathematician Perelman gives a complete proof of the Poincare conjecture, domestic media appear this kind of errors and misleading Qiu Chengtong matter, now, Cao Huaidong, Zhu Xiping are whether the article after the normal review procedures are in doubt. Said Ding Weiyue. Why did Ding Weiyue come out to talk? Why do you choose this moment to speak? Soon, it was found, a year ago, the network has been streaming Ding Weiyue shelling Qiu Chengtongs speech record...... Poincare guessed that the press conference violated academic norms Youth weekend (hereinafter referred to as Green Week): you question a series of events surrounding Poincares conjecture, and specifically challenge it Ding Weiyue: (hereinafter referred to as Ding): I think there are a few points. First of all, serious scientific issues such as Poincares conjecture should be discussed or debated within the academic community, rather than the media or an