后现代科学观——费耶阿本德与拉图尔比较分析postmodern science - feyenoord bender and latour comparative analysis.pdfVIP

other scientific studies. They, with knowledge of the newly born post-modern perspectives of science, through the field investigation on daily scientific activities, carried the social constructivism into a deeper and more complicated field of research and developed a completely new studying way of SSK. They are generally regarded as the second generation of SSK. Latour became one of the primary representatives in the “Science Wars”, and was later universally acknowledged as the spokesman of the post-modernism for his extreme idealism and radical relativism. SSK, a succession of historicism, developed historicism by means of a wider range of societal-cultural research methods. Latour’s radical viewpoints on science, at some extent, showed its similarity with Feyerabend’s and therefore, suffered a most severe criticism from the right-winged modern scholars during the Science Wars. Seemingly the movement now came to pause; yet, the tension between of science and humanities will definitely continue on. The relationship between science and humanities will take a new look with the advancement of the human society. This paper discusses the revolutionary changes of post-modern perspectives of science within the scope of knowledge of my major. It is conducted mainly from the viewpoints of philosophy of science and sociology of science, and with the Marxist philosophy of science and technology, namely the Nature Dialectics, as its guide. Historical changes of post-modern perspectives of science between the periods from late 1950’s to early 21 century are told here, and especially, comparative study of the main thoughts between two m