公司介绍_66850.pptVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
公司介绍_66850

* * * Agrawal, Sangeeta., Andreski, Patricia. and Belli, Robert. CATI Event History Calendar and Question-List Methods: Accuracy of Life Course Retrospective Reports?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Pointe Hilton Tapatio Cliffs, Phoenix, Arizona, May 11, 2004 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * [SHOW TELL] And while it was recognized that doing LH as TZ did would be enormously difficult: time, energy, money, compiling, synthesizing, interpreting, etc… Many subsequent publications used LH technique (on smaller scale!). Like social work, these were “slices of life” for those populations not typically studied ( certainly not from their POV). Becker (1970) on Shaw: LH provides voice from a culture/situation not ordinarily known (to sociologists), enables soc to improve theories, become aware of biases/assumptions that shape research design. * Thank goodness for the Depression – kept writers academics working recorded/preserved a lot of data!! More Oral History collection – not LH in sociological sense w/analysis, theory, etc /ammem/wpaintro/wpahome.html * ditto /ammem/snhtml/snhome.html * It does acknowledge one of the main difficulties with any kind of biographical data collection, which is… * Can you believe that?! * Anyway … So, LH is tooling along, when … * Um… * Don’t eat the salmon mousse! * [SHOW TELL??] Riveting! A turner! I laughed! I laughed! Fun fascinating deconstruction of PP – actually a Bad Review overall, with a very prominent “but”! TZ conclusions not based solely on methodology data – must’ve had other info sources (personal knowledge, etc). Better yet are the comments by TZ about HBs analysis. But the kicker is the transcript of the panel discussion – 14 panelists, including HB WIT. Same-o, same-o: what is “valid” “authentic” etc?! Arguments about how truly useful LHs are: not by themselves, but in concer

文档评论(0)

xy88118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档