Non Systemize – They do NOT take our explicit points and 非制度化–他们不把我们的明确的分.docVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约5.92万字
约 24页
2018-03-26 发布于江西
举报
版权申诉

Non Systemize – They do NOT take our explicit points and 非制度化–他们不把我们的明确的分.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Non Systemize – They do NOT take our explicit points and 非制度化–他们不把我们的明确的分.doc

Western Academy of Management Breaking OUR Frame: The Undergraduate Education System Ralph F. Mullin Professor of Management George W. Wilson Professor of Economics Dean Harmon College of Business Administration Central Missouri State University Contact: Ralph F. Mullin Professor of Management D 401E Central Missouri State University Warrensburg, MO 64093 660/543-4818 (O) 660/864-6300 (Cell) email: mullin@cmsu1.cmsu.edu Major portions of this paper are derived from previously published articles including Mullin, Ralph F. (2001). The undergraduate revolution: Change the system or give Incrementalism another 30 years. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. Vol. 33, No. 5. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. And, Mullin, Ralph F. and Wilson, George W. (2001). Quality of Undergraduate Education: Examining the Current Paradigm and System. Journal of Quality Management 4(1): 1-38. Western Academy of Management Breaking OUR Frame: The Undergraduate Education System The thesis of this article is that we in the management discipline need to apply our knowledge—about organizations, management, quality, organizational learning, and change—to challenge the frame of our own undergraduate education system. We have ignored this need due to paradigm blindness, less than passionate commitment to serve our customers, willingness to conform rather than risk challenging the system, and vagrant leadership at the top. Unintentional or not, we have a challenging responsibility to lead the effort to examine our frame and consider an alternative frame, a quality learning system, driven by a superior core learning process, for undergraduate education. It is a task for only the strong, the caring, the intellectually honest, the tenaciously persistent, and those who unselfishly serve the learners. The purpose of this paper is sevenfold: 1) to raise our current frame (paradigm, system, and core process) into full consciousness—to make it explicit, 2) to ex