影响页岩气产能的关键因素(英文)shale gas.pptVIP

Production Technology Water frac （清水压裂，1999) Types of Porous Media Inorganic mudrock Organic Matter Pores Pores in organics range from 5 to 1,000 nm (Reed and others, 2008) Permeability of Organic Matter Effect of Sample Type Confining Pressure Effect Adsorption is predominantly on kerogen to a lesser degree on clay. Adsorption is a function of TOC, pressure, temperature, shale type kerogen type. Flow Mechanisms Key Controls in Shale Gas Production Fred P Wang Bureau of Economic Geology John and Katherine Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin August 26th, 2010 Xian, China Is Barnett Shale, North Texas the best gas shale? Shale gas and oil are fascinating We do not know much about them They are full of surprises Shale Gas and Oil Can shale gas better than tight-sand gas? China Europe 2010 USA 2004-09 Shale Gas Initiatives U.S.A. New Albany Lewis Cane Creek Gammon Niobrara Antrim Canada Alaska Lisbume Shale-Gas Potential in North America Modified from EIA, 2009; Dawson, F. M., 2008; Schlumberger, 2005. Established Emerging Horn River (EOG 23 MMcf IP) Muskwa Montney Colorado Marcellus Utica Ohio Marfa Mancos/Mowry Baxter Floyd Fayetteville Barnett/ Woodford Pearsall Woodford Caney Bend Barnett Horton Bluff-Elgin Shale Utica Shale 9,000 wells 250–2,500 ft 2.5 Tcf cum. gas 35–76 tcf 2,000–8,000 ft Range IP: 24.5 MMcf 50-370 tcf 14,300 wells 6500–9,000 ft Cum. Prod.: 7 Tcf 26-44 tcf 600 wells 11,000–14,000 ft Highest IP: 31.175 MMcf ~250 tcf Bossier Haynesville (?) wells (commingled) 3,000–6,000 ft 9600 wells 1,500–6,000 ft Cum. Prod.2.7 tcf Eagle Ford Type Biogenic and thermogenic Depth 500–18,000 ft Pressure 200–12,000 psi Pressure gradient 0.2–0.95 psi/ft Temperature 85–360oF Thickness 20–2,000 ft Porosity 2–15% Organic content (TOC) 2–25% Thermal maturity (VRo) 0.4-5 Gas content 15–400 scf/ton Quartz/carbonate content ?–80% Haynesville Barnett-Woodford, Delaw