我们的系统应该满足这四个requirements.pptVIP

Analyzing Individual Performance of Source Code Review Using Reviewer’s Eye Movement Hidetake Uwano, Masahide Nakamura, Akito Monden and Ken-ichi Matsumoto Nara Institute of Science and Technology Introduction Capturing Eye Movement in Code Review Experimental Evaluation of Individual Performance of Code Review Using Eye Movement Discussion Conclusion My Thought Introduction Source code review is intended to find and fix defects overlooked in early development phases. The long-term goal is to establish an efficient method that allows the reviewer to find as many defects as possible. Several methodologies that can be used for the code review have been proposed, but there has been no significant conclusion on which review method is the best. The reason is that the performance of individual subjects is more dominant than the review method itself. To characterize the reviewer’s performance in an objective way, this paper proposes to use eye movements of the reviewer. They developed a software application, “Crescent( Code Review Evaluation System by Capturing Eye movemeNT)”, to measure and record the eye movements during the code review. Capturing Eye Movement in Code Review Requirements R1: Line-wise tracking of eye movements R2: Identification of reviewer’s focus R3: Record of time-sequenced lines R4: Analysis supports Integrated Measuring Environment Result Viewer Experimental Evaluation of Individual Performance of Code Review Using Eye Movement Preliminaries Five graduate students participated in the experiment as the reviewers. They have prepared 6 small-scale programs written in the C language. Programs reviewed in the experiment The fixation criteria as the area of 30 pixels in diameter where the eye mark stays more than 50 ms. Task of code review Calibrate the eye tracker so that that eye movement of the subject are logged correctly. Explain the specification of the program to the subject verbally. Synchronizing the subject to start the code review to find defe