05第五章+国际贸易运输地理100530[1].pptVIP

The ports listed remained the same for the second consecutive year, with a slight shifting of fortunes and jostling for position for those further down the league. The top 5 ports all retained their respective positions in 2008. Shanghai matched this growth rate and maintained its position in second place. This was a much lower growth rate than the 20per cent experienced over the last few years. The gap between Singapore and Shanghai widened slightly in 2008 to 1.9million TEUs, from 1.7million in the previous year, despite extra capacity with the completion of the third-phase  HongKong (China) remained in third place, despite a weak growth rate of just 1per cent over the previous year. The neighbouring port of Shenzhen achieved a 1.5per cent growth rate in 2008, compared to 14per cent in 2007, to remain in fourth place. Busan remained LQ?IWKSODFHZLWKDVLPLODUJURZWKUDWHRIMXVWSHU cent in 2008. Dubai continued its steady upward climb, rising one place after growing by 11per cent. Ningbo and Guangzhou both moved up an impressive four places after increasing their throughput by around 20per cent. Rotterdam fell by three places to ninth place, as a result of static throughput. Qingdao held on to its tenthplace, with a 9per cent growth rate. Hamburg dropped by two places to end in eleventhplace. Kaohsiung continued its HongKong (China) remained in third place, despite a weak growth rate of just 1per cent over the previous year. The neighbouring port of Shenzhen achieved a 1.5per cent growth rate in 2008, compared to 14per cent in 2007, to remain in fourth place. Busan remained LQ?IWKSODFHZLWKDVLPLODUJURZWKUDWHRIMXVWSHU cent in 2008. Dubai continued its steady upward climb, rising one place after growing by 11per cent. Ningbo and Guangzhou both moved up an impressive four places after increasing their throughput by around 20per cent. Rotterdam fell by three places to ninth place, as a result of static throughpu