羽毛球运动员在预判过程中视觉搜索特征的实验分析-experimental analysis of the visual search characteristics of badminton players in the process of preliminary judgment.docxVIP

AbstractObjective:Through special immortal and sports college badminton badminton in colleges and universities majoring in college students under the quiet state, fatigue state when watching the dynamic movement scene visual search features in the process of forecasting experiment research, explores influence badminton players in the process of the anticipation biological factors and its mechanism of visual search, to evaluate the effect of exercise training and selection of implementation and improve the scientific level of training, etc. To provide theoretical reference.Methods:Adopts the model of experts - novice research, man good badminton players in shaanxi province to the panel, the mens badminton in xi an institute of physical education specialty students for novice group. Using E - Prime program and eye movement instrument test increases the two groups respectively before and after load exercise anticipation reaction and eye movement indicators; Determination of two groups of subjects were quiet at the same time and heart rate immediately after exercise, blood pressure and blood lactic acid and other physiological indicators; Subjective fatigue level test in the end.Experimental results:Before and after the movement,Panel reaction time was significantly less than novice group (P 0.01); Forecasting accuracy were significantly greater than novice group (P 0.01)Before and after the movement,?novice panel anticipation time were significantly shorter in group (P 0.05, 0.01); ?The forecasting accuracy is significantly higher than novice group (P 0.05, 0.01);?Panel in the gaze of different fixation point number was significantly less than novice group (P 0.05, 0.01);?Panel anticipation pitch saccadic distance is greater than the novice group significantly (P 0.01);?Expert group on the racket, arms, legs and waist of the fixation point more than novice group significantly (P 0.05, 0.01);?The panel participants scanning track is more simple and orderly, fixat