语用论辩理论视野下的法律论证分析-analysis of legal argumentation from the perspective of pragmatic argument theory.docxVIP

AbstractThetheoryofpragma-dialecticalinthispaperFransVanEemerenandRobGrootendorstcreatedisbasedonpragmatics,abidebytheapplicationofitsprinciplesoflanguage,thespeechacttheorytoanalyzetheuseofargumentationofspeech.Criticaltestofallkindsofargumentationschemesusedintheargument,attemptsthroughtheidealcriticaldiscussionmodetotrulyeliminatethedifferencesofopinionbetweenthemainargument.Debateexistswidelyinmanyfieldsormorecontext,judicialactivitiesisinfactaspecialcontextargumentprocess,legalargumentfortheprocessisparticipatory,setlogic,rhetoricandargumentationinoneactivity.Andthispaperisbasedonthepragma-dialecticaltheory,fromthetwoaspectsofargumentationofpragmaticandcriticalanalysisandresearchonthelegalargumentation.Thispaperisdividedintothreepartstocarryonthewriting:Thefirstpartfocusesontherelevanttheoreticalknowledgeinpragma-dialecticaltheory.Includingadoptedtheargumentationtheoryargumentview,thedefinitionofargument，thestartingpointandtherationalityproblem.Thendiscussesfromtheangleofcriticalargumentationinthisdebateinordertoresolvedifferencesofopinionrequiredbythecriticalstage,hadtoobservetherulesofcriticaldiscussionandcriticalquestionsadoptedbytheargumentsoftheschemarequiredtoanswer.Finally,fromthepointofviewofpragmaticdiscoursetospeakinthiskindofargumentationmeansthatacertainact,thedebatersshouldabidebytheprinciplesandrulesofdebatelanguageusetoavoidfallacy,alsocarryonthereconstructiontotheunexpressedpremisebyadoptingthemethodofpragmaticofthemaximumvalue,toconstructacompleteargument.Thesecondpartbrieflydescribesavarietyoflegalargumentationmode,fromtheformalandinformaltwoaspectstoanalyseandcomparethevarietyoflegalargumentationmode.Andthenputforwardageneralizedmodeloflegalargumentation,namelythelegalargumentationshouldbeformalandinformalcombination,process,procedureandresultoftheunity,theprosecution,theprosecutorandthejudgeareinactivities.Thethirdpartexpoundstheconcreteapplicationoftherelevantknowledgeofpragma-dialecticaltheoryinactivitiesinlegalargumentation.Toanalyzetheac