- 6
- 0
- 约2.77万字
- 约 56页
- 2018-06-10 发布于河南
- 举报
Whats it like to be male_female_gay_lawyer_priest…
Questioning Your Questions Questions of accuracy force us to evaluate and test for truth and correctness Questions of precision force us to give details and be specific Questions of consistency force us to examine our thinking for contradictions Questions of logic force us to consider how we are putting the whole of our thought together, to make sure that it all adds up and makes sense within a reasonable system of some kind Socratic Thinking Probing, analytic, synthetic, creative, connection-forming thought ? construction of a logical system of understandings ? leading to insight ? a natural way to develop and test our understanding of content ? a natural way to give life to content Redefine Grades as Levels of Thinking and Learning Best Learners: Continually assess their learning against standards of excellence Are not dependent on instructors to tell them how well they are doing Tie each step of their learning process to a self-reflective step of self-assessment Seek to enter the foundations of any subject and use that foundation to understand everything else within the subject Seek to identify the most basic kinds of information used by professionals within the field Do not memorize random bits of information, their learning is problem or question based They state a problem, assess for clarity, gather information, check it for relevance, form an interpretation and check the interpretation to see what it’s based on and whether it is adequate Developing Strategies for Self-Assessment Using profiles to assess your performance Exemplary students High-performing students Mixed-quality students Low-performing students Incompetent students Exemplary Students (Grade of A) The exemplary student has internalized the basic intellectual standards appropriate to the assessment of his or her own work in a subject and is highly skilled at self-evaluation. They regularly: Raise important questions and issues Analyze key questions and problems Recognize questionable assumption
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 核医学教学课件:血液和淋巴显像.ppt VIP
- 重庆市各地方周氏支族源流(1-170支族).doc VIP
- 建筑工程质量管理体系流程图.docx
- 淋巴系统核医学检查课件.ppt VIP
- (高清版)B-T 6003.1-2022 试验筛 技术要求和检验 第1部分:金属丝编织网试验筛.pdf VIP
- (已压缩)TUCST007-2020房屋建筑与市政基础设施工程施工安全风险评估技术标准.docx VIP
- 2026年国家公务员考试申论真题及参考答案(考生回忆版).docx VIP
- 部编版语文二年级上册期中常考七大重点题型专项训练.docx VIP
- 机器人操作系统(ROS)及仿真应用 课件全套 第1--9章 Linux Ubuntu入门基础--- 基于ROS的服务机器人应用实例.ppt
- 压疮的预防及护理技术操作考核评分标准编辑.docx VIP
原创力文档

文档评论(0)