RESEARCH METHODS THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF WAR的研究方法战争的政治经济.pptVIP

RESEARCH METHODS THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF WAR的研究方法战争的政治经济.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
RESEARCH METHODS THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF WAR的研究方法战争的政治经济

RESEARCH METHODS Research Methods: Procedures designed to establish facts about the social world. Please Note: This section is not from the book. Take Notes. SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE Tradition: Received Wisdom, part of cultural heritage; Common sense, “gut feeling” Authority: Speaking as a result of status as “expert” Guard against, the “expert” speaking outside his or her Area of expertise. The “expert” is not infallible. Personal Experience: It must be true because “I experienced” such and so. VERSUS SCIENCE Systematic+ Logical framework+ Empirical Evidence+ Falsification A system of checks and balances to extract truth. Fallacies of Thinking 1. Inaccurate Observation Casual versus systematic Observation Using instruments that guard against inaccuracy 2. Over-generalization One or a few cases is representative of the whole Choose large sample, randomly; replicate study 3.Selective Observation Observation that fits in with your biases 4.Ecological Fallacy (Ecological refers to things bigger than the individual, like groups and systems) Concluding what is characteristic of a group is characteristic of every single individual 5.Reductionism Explaining a variety of complex events or behaviors by a single or narrow set of causes E.g.: Psychiatric Reductionism Scientific Generalizing VS Stereotype Scientific Generalizing is: Systematic Logical Empirical Falsifiable Stereotyping is: Casual Doesn’t guard against fallacies of thinking. Types of Research 1. Cross Sectional Covers the entire spectrum at one point in time. E.g. US Census Data 2. Longitudinal Studies changes in a population over time Trend Studies: Changes in the population over time Cohort: Changes in a cohort (sub population over time. Panel Studies: Changes in the same sample of the population (the panel) over time. Quantitative VS Qualitative I. Quantitative: measuring with numbers Used in the Positivistic school in sociology: A school that seeks scientific measurement to extract laws ab

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档