Survey Research PPT California State University, Fullerton加利福尼亚州立大学的调查的研究PPT,富勒顿.pptVIP

Survey Research PPT California State University, Fullerton加利福尼亚州立大学的调查的研究PPT,富勒顿.ppt

此“教育”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Survey Research PPT California State University, Fullerton加利福尼亚州立大学的调查的研究PPT,富勒顿

SURVEY RESEARCH Survey Research a.k.a. “paper-pencil” measures or “self-report” measures represents the dominant paradigm for social science research in the last 30 years advantages: expedience in gathering data yields interval level data Do subjects know their own minds? problems: problem of “mindfulness,” verbal reports of mental processes are suspect problem of “non-attitudes,” people tend to venture an opinion whether they have one or not unreliability of self-reports data: even factual information can be misreported Will subjects tell you if they know? intentional misreporting of information. social desirability bias reasons for non-disclosure embarrassment fear of negative sanctions shame, public humiliation privacy sometimes helpful to include a “lie scale” Questionnaire Design and Construction phrasing of questions is critical avoid vague, nebulous questions Bad example: “What do you think about abortion?” Bad example: “How many children do you have?” questions must be clear, unambiguous Good example: “Which of the following statements best represents your attitude toward elective abortions in the first trimester?” Conduct a “readability analysis” avoid lengthy questions; keep questions short, succinct Bad example: Sara Palin would be the first female Vice President Secretary of the United States. Do you think her gender wuold be a problem in negotiating with the Arab world, which is a male-dominated culture? Good example: Would Hillary Clinton make a good Supreme Court justice? questionnaire design and construction--continued avoid double-barreled questions (compound questions) Bad example: “Do you favor stricter hand gun controls and mandatory minimum sentences for carjackers?” avoid loaded language (push polling) Bad example: “Don’t you think that...?” “Isn’t it true that...?” Bad example: Emotionally charged words: “ gang member,” “welfare mother,” “extremist groups,” “spin doctor,” etc. avoid slang, jargon, abbreviations and acronyms Bad example: “S

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档