BSEP在辅助生殖技术助孕ICP患者胎盘中表达及意义.docVIP

  • 6
  • 0
  • 约9.15千字
  • 约 14页
  • 2018-08-11 发布于福建
  • 举报

BSEP在辅助生殖技术助孕ICP患者胎盘中表达及意义.doc

BSEP在辅助生殖技术助孕ICP患者胎盘中表达及意义

BSEP在辅助生殖技术助孕ICP患者胎盘中表达及意义   [摘要] 目的 探?胆盐输出泵(BSEP)在ART助孕和正常受孕妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症(ICP)患者胎盘组织中的表达及意义。 方法 采用Western blot和RT-PCR方法检测我院收治的15例自然受孕ICP患者(ICP组)、15例ART助孕ICP患者(ART组)及9例正常妊娠患者(对照组)胎盘组织中 BSEP蛋白和mRNA 的表达情况,分析三组ICP胎盘中BSEP表达的差异。 结果 Western blot和RT-PCR法显示BSEP蛋白和mRNA在自然受孕ICP胎盘中表达分别为(0.443±0.102)和(8.139±4.490),在ART来源胎盘中表达分别为(0.490±0.117)和(9.992±5.253),而正常妊娠胎盘组织中表达明显减少(0.161±0.013)和(1.038±0.271),ICP组和ART组差异无明显差异(P0.05),而这两组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。 结论 BSEP 蛋白在正常妊娠胎盘组织中微量表达,而在 ICP 患者胎盘组织中高表达,可能与 ICP的发病有关,但自然受孕ICP胎盘和ART助孕ICP胎盘中BSEP 蛋白无差异,提示ART助孕并不增加子代妊娠期ICP的发病风险。   [关键词] 辅助生殖技术;蛋白质印迹法 ;妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症;反转录?聚合酶链反应;胆盐输出泵   [中图分类号] R715.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-9701(2018)03-0008-04   Significance and expression of BSEP in placenta of ICP patients treated with assisted reproductive technology   LIU Linli ZHANG Liangchen ZHU Siyuan QI Biru HUANG Mian   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fuzhou First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the significance and the expression of bile salt export pump(BSEP) in placenta of patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy(ICP) of natural conception or pregnancy through ART treatment. Methods The expression of BSEP proteion and mRNA in placenta of 15 ICP patients of natural conception(ICP group), 15 ICP patients treated with ART(ART group) and 9 normal cases of natural conception(control group) attended our hospital was detected by Western blot and RT-PCR. The difference of BSEP expression in three groups of ICP placenta was analyzed. Results The Western blot and RT-PCR showed that the expression of BSEP protein and mRNA in ICP placenta of natural conception was (0.443±0.102) and (8.139±4.490), respectively. The expression in the placenta of ART group was (0.490±0.117) and (9.992±5.253), respectively. The expression in the placenta of control group was significant less, which was (0.161±0.013) and (1.038±0.271), respectively. There was no significant difference between

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档