X线与CT诊断胸腰椎骨折应用价值分析.docVIP

X线与CT诊断胸腰椎骨折应用价值分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
X线与CT诊断胸腰椎骨折应用价值分析

X线与CT诊断胸腰椎骨折应用价值分析   [摘要] 目的 分析X线与CT诊断胸腰椎骨折的应用价值。 方法 方便选择该院自2016年5月―2017年5月期间收治的胸腰椎骨折患者66例,所有患者均由手术确诊。依据诊断方法差异性均分两组。实施X线诊断的33例患者为参照组,实施CT诊断的33例患者为研究组,最后对两组患者的诊断结果进行统计和总结。 结果 经不同方法诊断后,研究组患者的检出率(100.0%)较比参照组患者的检出率(81.8%)明显较高,组间数据统计后差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。比对两组患者的骨折临床分型,研究组安全带型诊断准确率(100.0%)和爆裂型诊断准确率(100.0%)较比参照组的30.0%、40.0%更高,组间数据统计后差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。从两组患者的椎管狭窄、椎体骨折线、附件骨折准确率和椎弓根间增宽方面来看,研究组68.2%、90.9%、53.0%、60.6%较比参照组48.5%、75.8%、33.3%、42.4%更优,组间数据统计后差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 胸腰椎骨折予以CT诊断具有较高的检出率,同时可以将骨折临床分型和影像学特征充分体现,在一定程度上可以为后续手术治疗提供有利依据,临床应用价值存在。   [关键词] X线;CT;胸腰椎骨折;应用价值   [中图分类号] R687 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)09(b)-0164-03   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to evaluate the value of X-ray and CT in the diagnosis of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods 66 cases of patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated from May 2016 to May 2017 in this hospital were conveniently selected and were diagnosed by the surgery. All the patients were equally divided into two groups based on the different diagnosis methods. 33 cases with X-ray diagnosis were regarded as the control group, and 33 cases with CT diagnosis were regarded as the research group, and then the diagnosis results of the two groups were concluded and collected. Results After diagnosis by different methods, the detection rate was 100.0% in the study group, significantly higher than that of the reference group of 81.8%, and the data between the two groups were significantly different(P0.05). According to the comparison of clinical classification of fractures in the two groups, the safety diagnostic accuracy was 100.0% and burst diagnostic accuracy was 100.0%, higher than the reference group of 30.0% and 40.0%, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). From the aspects of the spinal stenosis, vertebral fracture line, the accuracy of the attachment fracture and the widening of the pedicle, the scores were 68.2%, 90.9%, 53.0% and 60.6% of the study group, better than those in the reference group of 48.5%, 75.8%, 3

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档