α干扰素栓联合微波治疗人乳头瘤病毒感染宫颈糜烂疗效观察.docVIP

α干扰素栓联合微波治疗人乳头瘤病毒感染宫颈糜烂疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
α干扰素栓联合微波治疗人乳头瘤病毒感染宫颈糜烂疗效观察

α干扰素栓联合微波治疗人乳头瘤病毒感染宫颈糜烂疗效观察   【第一作者简介】傅亚平(1975-),女,主治医师,主要从事妇产科临床诊治与研究工作。   【摘要】目的:分析α-干扰素栓联合微波治疗HPV感染宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法:选取2012年7月至2013年7月期间于我院妇科门诊实施治疗的HPV感染宫颈糜烂患者90例,按照就诊顺序将其随机分为研究组与参照组两组。其中研究组(45例)采用α-干扰素栓与微波配合治疗,参照组(45例)仅采用微波治疗,对比两组的临床治疗效果。结果:研究组的治疗有效率明显高于参照组(93??33% VS 75??56%),半年、1年复发率明显低于参照组(4??65% VS 15??56%,9??30% VS 24??44%),P<0??05;另讲师外,在研究组不同病变程度治疗总有效率上,中度糜烂型明显高于重度糜烂型(96??00% VS 77??78%),P<0??05,有统计学意义。结论:α-干扰素栓配合微波治疗HPV感染宫颈糜烂,操作简便,治疗效果显著,副反应少,反复发病率低,安全可靠,值得临床广泛应用。   【关键词】α-干扰素栓;微波治疗;HPV感染;宫颈糜烂   Curative effect of alpha interferon suppository combining microwave in treating human papillama virus infected cervical erosionFU YaPing, CHEN LinHai. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yiwu Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Jinhua 322000, China   【Abstract】Objectives: To analyze the clinical effects of alpha interferon suppository combining microwave in the treatment of human papillama virus (HPV) infected cervical erosion. Methods: 90 patients with HPV infected cervical erosion that received outpatient treatment in the Department of Gynaecology in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2013 were selected and randomly divided into research group and control group according to visiting order. The research group (45 cases) adopted alpha interferon suppository combining microwave therapy, while control group (45 cases) only adopted microwave treatment. Clinical therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The treatment effect of research group was obviously higher than control group (93.33% VS 75??56%), while its recurrence rates half a year and one year later were significantly lower than these of control group (4.65% VS 15.56%, 9.30% VS 24.44%), P 0.05; In addition, of the total effective rate at different degree of pathological changes in the research group, moderate erosion type was significantly higher than severe erosion type (96.00% VS 77.78%), P0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusions: Alpha interferon suppository combining micr

文档评论(0)

fangsheke66 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档