- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PDCA循环护理管理对老年晚期肺癌化疗患者继发感染和自我效能感影响
PDCA循环护理管理对老年晚期肺癌化疗患者继发感染和自我效能感影响
[摘要] 目的 观察PDCA循环护理管理对老年晚期肺癌化疗患者自我效能感、继发感染及护理质量的影响。 方法 收集2012年1月~2014年12月于新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院特需一科(以下简称“我科”)接受化疗治疗的52例老年晚期肺癌患者作为对照组,2015年1月~2016年12月于我科接受化疗治疗的64例晚期肺癌患者作为观察组。对照组患者给予常规护理干预,观察组患者给予PDCA循环护理管理。分别采用一般自我效能感量表(GSES)和自制问卷调查评价自我效能感和护理质量。回顾性分析患者临床资料,比较两组患者自我效能感、继发感染及护理质量。 结果 干预后,两组患者GSES评分均升高,且观察组干预后评分高于同期对照组(P 0.05)。观察组继发感染率低于对照组,护理质量评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05或P 0.01)。 结论 PDCA循环护理管理在老年晚期肺癌化疗中应用效果良好,能够提高患者的自我效能感,降低继发感染发生率,提高护理质量,临床上值得应用。
[关键词] PDCA循环;护理管理;老年;晚期肺癌;化疗;自我效能感;继发感染;护理质量
[中图分类号] R473 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)12(a)-0160-04
[Abstract] Objective To observe the effects of PDCA cycle nursing management on self-efficiency, secondary infection and nursing quality in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer treated with chemotherapy. Methods 52 elderly patients with advanced lung cancer who received chemotherapy in the First Department of VIP Service, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University (“our department” for short) from January 2012 to December 2014 were collected as the control group, and 64 elderly patients with advanced lung cancer who received chemotherapy in our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were collected as the observation group. The control group was given to conventional nursing intervention, while the observation group was given to PDCA cycle nursing management. General Self-efficiency Scale (GSES) and self-made questionnaire were employed to assess self-efficiency and nursing quality respectively. Retrospectively analyzing their clinical materials, self-efficiency, secondary infection and nursing quality were compared between the two groups then. Results After intervention, in comparison with the control group, the GSES score of the observation group was significantly increased and the incidence of secondary infection was significantly decreased (P 0.05 or P 0.01). Self-made questionnaire showed that the scores of service attitude, professional skill and health
文档评论(0)