iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部应用可信度研究.docVIP

iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部应用可信度研究 　　[摘要] 目的 通过对头部模型面部的测量分析，来研究iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部应用的精确性与准确性。方法 利用iWitness摄影测量系统重复获取头部模型标志点的三维坐标值，来评估在不同状态下系统应用的精确性。通过计算模型三维测量的线性距离值与真实距离值之间的差异及分布情况来检查测量数据的准确性与偏倚性。结果 在非缩放状态与缩放状态下操作误差分别为0.20 mm和0.09 mm，两者间差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；经多次校正的误差为0.251 mm，与仅作一次校正的摄像误差比较，差异无统计学意义（P0.05）。距离测量差异集中于±0.4 mm之间，准确性较高，无偏倚。结论 iWitness摄影测量系统在颌面部的标志点定位与点距测量上具有较高的可信度，可应用于面部形态的评估与记录。 　　[关键词] 人体测量学； 摄影测量学； 准确性； 精确性； 三维 　　[中图分类号] Q 984 [文献标志码] A [doi] 10.7518/hxkq.2015.03.017 　　[Abstract] Objective This study aims to test the accuracy and precision of iWitness photogrammetry for measuring the facial tissues of mannequin head. Methods Under ideal circumstances， the 3D landmark coordinates were repeatedly obtained from a mannequin head using iWitness photogrammetric system with different parameters， to examine the precision of this system. The differences between the 3D data and their true distance values of mannequin head were computed. Results Ope-rator error of 3D system in non-zoom and zoom status were 0.20 mm and 0.09 mm， and the difference was significant （P0.05）. Image captured error of 3D system was 0.283 mm， and there was no significant difference compared with the same group of 　　images （P0.05）. Error of 3D system with recalibration was 0.251 mm， and the difference was not statistically significant compared with image captured error （P0.05）. Good congruence was observed between means derived from the 3D photos and direct anthropometry， with difference ranging from ?0.4 mm to +0.4 mm. Conclusion This study provides further evi-dence of the high reliability of iWitness photogrammetry for several craniofacial measurements， including landmarks and inter-landmark distances. The evaluated system can be recommended for the evaluation and documentation of the facial surface. 　　[Key words] anthropometry； photogrammetry； accuracy； precision； three-dimensional 　　在颌面外科及整形外科领域，面部测量学在临床评估以及制定治疗计划等方面起着关键作用。与传统的测量技术相比，三维测量具有无可比拟的优势，为面部分析与诊断方面提供了巨大便利。目前，立体摄影术是最有发展前景的软组织评估方法[1]