中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎疗效观察.docVIP

中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎疗效观察.doc

  1. 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎疗效观察

中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎的疗效观察   【摘要】 目的:观察并分析中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎的疗效。方法:将2011年1月-2013年6月就诊于笔者所在医院的68例儿童特应性皮炎患者按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组34例。观察组给予健脾化湿导滞的自拟中药方治疗,对照组给予西药氯雷他定治疗,对比两组的疗效。结果:两组患儿治疗前皮损面积、皮损严重程度、瘙痒感程度比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患儿皮损面积、皮损严重程度、瘙痒感程度与本组治疗前比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后,观察组皮损面积评分为(1.09±0.79)分,皮损严重程度(2.02±1.69)分,瘙痒感程度(0.90±0.73)分,均优于治疗后对照组各项评分情况,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者治疗总有效率94.1%,对照组为76.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(字2=8.244,P0.05)。结论:中医药治疗儿童特应性皮炎效果肯定,可有效缓解患儿皮肤瘙痒程度,减少皮损程度,值得在临床推广应用。   【关键词】 儿童; 特应性皮炎; 中医药; 健脾化湿   中图分类号 R757.9 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1674-6805(2014)18-0012-03   The Observation of the Curative Effect of Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Children with Atopic Dermatitis/FU Wei-lan.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2014,12(18):12-14   【Abstract】 Objective: To observe and analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of children with atopic dermatitis.Method: 68 patients with atopic dermatitis from January 2011 to June 2013 in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, each groups of 34 cases. The observation group were received resolving dampness by tonifying spleen and stagnation prescription treatment and the control group were given western medicine loratadine treatment.The curative effect were compared between the two groups.Result: There were no significantly different of lesion area, the severity of lesions and itching degree between the two groups before treatment(P0.05). The lesion area, the severity of lesions and itching degree of the two groups after treatment were all significantly different with before treatment(P0.05).The lesion area was (1.09±0.79)scores, the severity of lesions was (2.02±1.69)scores, itching degree was (0.90±0.73)scores of the observation group which were better than the control group after treatment(P0.05). The effective rate of the control group was 76.5% while the observation group was 94.1% after treatment, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(字2=8.244,P

文档评论(0)

3471161553 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档