- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理干预对预防产科母婴同室病房院内感染效果分析
优质护理干预对预防产科母婴同室病房院内感染的效果分析
[摘要]目的 探讨优质护理干预对预防产科母婴同室病房院内感染的效果。方法 选取我院2014年1月~2015年8月收治的母婴同室分娩的产妇71例作为研究对象,根据入院顺序进行编号并利用随机数表法将所有研究对象分为对照组35例和观察组36例,对照组患者予以常规护理,观察组患者实施优质护理干预,观察比较两组患者的院内感染发生率、护理满意度。结果 观察组产妇上呼吸道感染、表浅切口感染、泌尿系统感染等院内感染发生率8.3%,明显低于对照组34.3%(P0.05);对照组护理满意度80.0%,观察组护理满意度为97.2%,观察组护理满意度明显高于对照组(P0.05)。结论 优质护理干预对预防产科母婴同室病房院内感染(上呼吸道感染、表浅切口感染等)的效果突出,深受患者认可,值得推广。
[关键词]优质护理干预;产科;母婴同室;院内感染
[中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)09(a)-0183-03
Effect analysis of high quality nursing intervention on prevention of nosocomial infection in“rooming-in”in obstetrical department
HU Hui-ying
Department of Gynecology,Shangrao People′s Hospital in Jiangxi Province,Shangrao 334000,China
[Abstract]Objective To explore the efficacy of high quality nursing intervention on prevention of nosocomial infection in “rooming-in”.Methods A total of 71 delivered puerperae from January 2014 to August 2015 in “rooming-in” in our hospital were selected.According to the order of admission and a random number table,all participants were divided into control group (n=35) and observation group (n=36).In the control group,regular nursing was used,while in the observation group,high quality nursing intervention was adopted.The incidence of nosocomial infection and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results In the observation group,the incidence of nosocomial infection including upper respiratory tract infection,superficial incision infection,and urinary system infection,etc. was 8.3%,much lower than that in the control group accounting for 34.3% (P0.05).The nursing satisfaction in the control group was 80.0%,while in the observation group,the satisfaction rate was 97.2%.The nursing satisfaction in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P0.05).Conclusion High quality nursing intervention on the prevention of nosocomial infection including upper respiratory tract infection and superficial wound infection,etc.i
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 怎样选购冰箱.doc VIP
- 2025年新生儿窒息复苏考试试题(附答案).docx VIP
- 系统性红斑狼疮护理查房.ppt VIP
- 魏晋玄学课件.ppt VIP
- 2020安徽芜湖一中高一自主招生考试语文试卷真题(含答案详解).pdf VIP
- 小学科学苏教版四年级上册第三单元《常见的力》教案(共4课)(2020新版).pdf
- 2024年包头市九原区社区工作者招聘真题 .pdf VIP
- 2021年安徽芜湖一中高一自主招生考试语文试卷真题(含答案详解).pdf VIP
- 二年级数学上册 作业本提优-第三单元提优测试卷 (含答案)(苏教版).docx VIP
- 工作票签发人负责人许可人上岗资格考试题B卷答案.docx VIP
文档评论(0)