- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
优质护理对糖尿病肾病患者血液透析临床效果分析
优质护理对糖尿病肾病患者血液透析的临床效果分析
[摘要] 目的 分析??质护理对糖尿病肾病患者血液透析的临床效果的影响。 方法 将我院从2014年3月~2016年2月共收糖尿病肾病患者140例,按照随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组,对照组给予患者进行常规护理治疗;实验组在对照组的基础上进行优质护理。对比两组患者护理之后的负面情绪状况。 结果 入院时,对照组患者焦虑标准分为(54.38±4.62)分,抑郁标准分为(55.48±5.30)分,干预2个月后,焦虑标准分为(49.95±4.27)分,抑郁标准分为(50.45±4.39)分。实验组患者焦虑标准分为(54.30±4.45)分,抑郁标准分为(55.33±5.17)分,干预2个月后,焦虑标准分为(46.29±2.23)分,抑郁标准分为(47.32±4.26)分,实验组低于对照组,具有统计学差异(P0.05)。经过治疗后,对照组病患护理合格率为82.86%,对护理满意程度为84.86%;实验组病患护理合格率为97.14%,对护理满意程度为97.14%。对照组低于实验组,两者具有统计学差异(P0.05)。 结论 优质护理可以显著改善病患的病情,提高治疗糖尿病肾病血液透析的临床效果以及改善病患的日常生活质量,应用价值极高,值得在临床中推广。
[关键词] 糖尿病;肾病;血液透析;临床效果;优质护理
[中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)08-128-04
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect of high quality nursing on patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods 140 cases of diabetic nephropathy cured in our hospital from March 2014 to February 2016 were selected and randomly divided into control group and experimental group according to random digital table method. Patients in control group wer treated with routine nursing, and patients in experimental group were treated with high quality nursing on the basis of routine nursing. Negative emotional state after nursing of the two groups were compared. Results On admission, the anxiety score of the control group was (54.38±4.62), criteria score of depression was (55.48±5.30). After 2 months of intervention, anxiety criteria score was (49.95±4.27), and criteria score of depression was (50.45±4.39). The standard of anxiety in the experimental group was (54.30±4.45), and criteria score of depression was (55.33±5.17). After 2 months of intervention, anxiety criteria score was (46.29±2.23), and criteria score of depression was (47.32±4.26). The experimental group was lower than that of the control group (P0.05). After treatment, the control group of patients with nursing pass rate was 82.86%, the degree of satisfaction for nursing was 84.86%, the experimental group of patients with nursing pass rate of 97.14%, the satisfaction degree
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 防火墙安全策略巡检报告.doc VIP
- XX职业技术学院“十五五”中长期发展规划(2026-2030年).docx
- 四川省成都市温江区2024-2025学年八年级上学期1月期末物理试题.docx VIP
- 游泳馆托管服务学生游泳培训服务方案.doc VIP
- “双减”背景下初中数学课堂教学提质增效探究 论文.docx VIP
- QC_T 556-2023 汽车制动器温度测量方法及热电偶安装要求.pdf VIP
- 清水河储能电站施工方案.pdf VIP
- 广州永日电梯电气原理图.pdf VIP
- 江苏省2022年高中学业水平合格性考试历史试卷真题(含答案详解).docx VIP
- 数学八下练习(图形的平移与旋转 ).doc VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)