- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
依达拉奉与血栓通联合治疗脑梗死效果分析
依达拉奉与血栓通联合治疗脑梗死的效果分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨依达拉奉联合血栓通治疗脑梗死的效果。 方法 回顾性分析2014年12月~2015年12月期间来我院进行治疗的137例脑梗死患者的临床资料,按照治疗方法分为两组,研究组68例用依达拉奉联合血栓通治疗;对照组69例单独应用血栓通治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效、神经功能缺损量表评分、日常生活能力(ADL)。结果 研究组的总有效率(88.2%)与对照组(68.1%)比较明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后两组神经功能缺损量表评分[(9.1±1.4) vs (14.6±2.8)]与治疗前[(19.3±3.5) vs (18.7±3.2)]比较明显降低,ADL评分[(73.7±14.6) vs (61.2±10.5)]与治疗前[(38.6±6.1) vs (39.4±5.7)]比较明显升高,研究组神经功能缺损量表评分降低程度、ADL评分升高的程度与对照组比较更明显,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 依达拉奉联合血栓通治疗脑梗死可收到显著疗效,可有效改善患者的神经功能缺失,提高日常生活能力,可在临床推广应用。
[关键词] 脑梗死;神经功能;依达拉奉;血栓通
[中图分类号] R743.33 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2016)10-0041-03
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of the cerebral infarction patients treated with edaravone and Xueshuantong. Methods The retrospective analysis included the clinical data of 137 patients with cerebral infarction, all of them were selected from December 2014 to December 2015 in our hospital, they were divided into two groups according to the treatment methods, the study group included 68 patients and were treated with edaravone and Xueshuantong; the control group included 69 cases and were treated with Xueshuantong. The clinical efficacy neurological deficit scale scores, activities of daily living(ADL) of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the study group rate (88.2%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (68.1%), the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). After treatment,the neurological deficit scale score of two groups[(9.1±1.4) vs (14.6±2.8)] were significant lower than before treatment[(19.3±3.5) vs (18.7±3.2)], daily living index score[(73.7±14.6) vs (61.2±10.5)] were increase significantly than before treatment[(38.6±6.1) vs (39.4±5.7)], the neurological deficit scale score reduced degree, activities of daily living index score elevated degree of the study group were more significant compared with control group, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion The clinical effect of cerebral infar
原创力文档


文档评论(0)