- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎应用替加环素治疗临床疗效
泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎应用替加环素治疗临床疗效
[摘要] 目的 探讨替加环素治疗泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的临床疗效。 方法 选择2014年1月~2016年12月在我院住院发生耐药鲍曼不动杆菌呼吸机相关肺炎患者60例的临床资料进行回顾性分析。其中30例患者采用美罗培南治疗为对照组,30例患者采用替加环素治疗为研究组。比较两组临床疗效,细菌清除率,出院1个月病死率。 结果 研究组总有效率为70%,显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组用药疗程较对照组时间长,细菌清除率为70%,显著高于对照组,出院1个月病死率为46.7%,显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 替加环素治疗泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎能够提高细菌清除率以及临床疗效,改善患者预后。
[关键词] 替加环素;耐药鲍曼不动杆菌;呼吸机相关性肺炎
[中图分类号] R563.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)10-22-04
Clinical efficacy of tigecycline for ventilator associated pneumonia with pan-drug resistant acinetobacter Bauman
WEI Wei1 LI Long1 WU Xiaomeng1 YUAN Xiumei2
1.Pharmacy Department, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Heilongjiang, Mudanjiang 157000, China; 2. The First Ward of Internal Medicine-Neurology, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Heilongjiang, Mudanjiang 157000, China
[Abstract] Objective To discuss the clinical efficacy of Tigecycline for Ventilator associated pneumonia with pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter Bauman. Methods Clinical data of 60 cases with Ventilator associated pneumonia with pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter Bauman from Jan 2014 to Dec 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. 30 cases treated with Meropenem were control group, and 30 cases treated with Tigecycline were study group. Clincal efficacy and bacterial clearance, mortality rate after one month of discharge of two groups were compared. Results Total effective rate of study group was 70%, which was higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). Medication course of study group was longer than that of control group(P0.05). Bacterial clearance rate of study group was 70%, which was higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). Mortality rate after one month of discharge of study group was 46.7%, which was lower than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant(
文档评论(0)