- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小容量注射器预防鼻肠管堵管临床应用与评价
小容量注射器预防鼻肠管堵管临床应用与评价
[摘要]目的 探讨小容量注射器行脉冲式冲管在预防鼻肠管堵管的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2016年6月~2017年6月江西省上饶市人民医院重症医学科100例行经鼻肠管肠内营养患者的临床资料,根据不同鼻肠管腔冲洗方式分为两组,各50例。两组肠内营养物均为能全力,?φ兆椴捎?50 ml注射器行匀速推注法冲洗管腔,观察组采用10 ml注射器行脉冲式冲洗管腔。比较两组再插管率、鼻肠管留置时间、住院时间、住院费用、护理满意度、及不良反应发生率。结果 观察组再插管率为4.00%,明显低于对照组16.00%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组鼻肠管留置时间明显长于对照组,住院时间明显短于对照组,住院费用明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组护理满意度为90.00%,明显高于对照组的74.00%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组不良发生发生率为6.00%,明显低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 小容量注射器可有效预防鼻肠管堵管,降低再插管率,延长鼻肠管留置时间,缓解患者痛苦,改善护理满意度,值得推广应用。
[关键词]鼻肠管堵管;小容量注射器;肠内营养
[中图分类号] R472 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)08(c)-0188-03
[Abstract]Objective To investigate the clinical application value of small-volume syringe with impulse pipe blowing in the prevention of nasointestinal tube blocking.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with enteral nutrition through nasointestinal tube in the department of intensive care unit in Shangrao People′s Hospital in Jiangxi from June 2016 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were divided into two groups according to irrigation methods of nasointestinal tube,50 cases in each.The enteral nutrients of two groups were nutrison fibre.The control group was given uniform velocity irrigation with 50 ml syringe,while the observation group was given impulse irrigation with 10 ml syringe.The reintubation rate,indwelling time of nasointestinal tube,hospital stays,hospitalization expense,nursing satisfaction and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results The reintubation rate of the observation group was 4.00%,which was lower than 16.00% of the control group (P0.05);the indwelling time of nasointestinal tube in the observation group was longer than that in the control group,the hospital stays were shorter than those in the control group,and the hospitalization expense was lower than that in the control group (P0.05);the nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 90.00%,which was higher than 74.00% of the control g
文档评论(0)