常规血液透析与高通量血液透析在肾病患者中治疗效果分析.docVIP

常规血液透析与高通量血液透析在肾病患者中治疗效果分析 　　【摘要】 目的：探究常规血液透析与高通量血液透析在肾病患者中的治疗效果。方法：选取笔者所在医院100例血液透析患者分组研究，对照组采用常规血液透析，研究组采用高通量血液透析，对比两组血清尿素（Urea）、肌酐（Cr）、β2-微球蛋白（β2-MG）、感染情况。结果：治疗前两组患者Urea、Cr、β2-MG含量比较，差异无统计学意义（P0.05）；治疗后研究组Urea、Cr、β2-MG含量明显下降，优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。对照组感染率34.00%，高于研究组的16.00%，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论：高通量血液透析比常规血液透析治疗肾病患者更具有优势，感染率低，安全性高，可推广应用。 　　【关键词】 肾病； 常规血液透析； 高通量血液透析 　　doi：10.14033/ki.cfmr.2017.30.004 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1674-6805（2017）30-0008-02 　　Treatment Effect Analysis of Regular Hemodialysis and High Flux Hemodialysis in Kidney Disease/ZHANG Yu-qi.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research，2017，15（30）：8-9 　　【Abstract】 Objective：To investigate the effect of conventional hemodialysis and high flux hemodialysis in patients with nephropathy.Method：100 cases of hemodialysis patients were grouped in our hospital，the control group used conventional hemodialysis，the study group used high flux hemodialysis，compared two groups of serum urea（Urea），creatinine（Cr），beta 2-microglobulin （β2-MG），infection.Result：Compared the two groups of patients before treatment of Urea，Cr andβ2-MG contents，there were no significant differences（P0.05）.After treatment，the study group of Urea，Cr，β2-MG content decreased significantly，which were better than those of the control group，the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.The infection rate of the control group was 34.00%，higher than that in the study group of 14.00%，the difference was statistically significant（P0.05）.Conclusion：High flux hemodialysis has more advantages than conventional hemodialysis treatment for kidney disease patients，the infection rate is low，high safety，and can be applied. 　　【Key words】 Kidney disease； Conventional hemodialysis； High flux hemodialysis 　　First-author’s address：Xiaogan Central Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology，Xiaogan 432100，China 　　目前?I衰竭患者多采取血液透析治疗，可有效清除患者尿毒症毒素，维持机体水、电解质、酸碱平衡，因而受到临床高度关注[1-3]。传统血液透析治疗近期效果良好，但随着治疗时间延长，患者体内大分子毒素不断累积，可能导致肺部感染、高血压、皮肤瘙痒等并发症，危害患者健康，降低患者生活