傻瓜威尔逊中言语反讽的关联理论分析-relevance theory analysis of verbal irony in fool wilson.docxVIP

下载本文档

32
0
约11.16万字
约 49页
2018-09-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

傻瓜威尔逊中言语反讽的关联理论分析-relevance theory analysis of verbal irony in fool wilson.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

傻瓜威尔逊中言语反讽的关联理论分析-relevance theory analysis of verbal irony in fool wilson

华北电力大学硕士学位论文华北电力大学硕士学位论文 PAGE PAGE 10 Chapter One Introduction Irony is a general linguistic phenomenon in verbal communication. Many a scholar has engaged in researching it so as to make clear its cognitive-pragmatic mechanism. And the thesis, based on the echoic- interpretation theory of irony within the framework of Relevance Theory proposed by Sperber and Wilson, applies the method of qualitative analysis and studies the specific verbal irony cases in Pudd’nhead Wilson. It tests the feasibility of linguistic theory in understanding literary work and sets up a new viewpoint to comprehend the literary text. Background It has been thousands of years for studying irony, which can be traced back to the ancient Greeks. After Plato, many scholars from various studying fields analyzed and explained this kind of language phenomenon— irony. The study of irony first originated in the field of rhetoric. Later, many analyses on irony appeared in the fields of semantics, psychology, pragmatics and especially cognitive pragmatics. With the development of pragmatics, many a scholar preceded deep and theoretical studies on its application, among which Grice’s interpretation of conversational implicature, Searle’s insincere speech act theory, and Leech’s politeness theory were of great significance. In 1981, Sperber and Wilson opened the door into a new world of irony comprehension. They proposed treating irony as a kind of implicit echoic dissociative use within the framework of Relevance Theory, developing the study of ironic utterances into a cognitive field, which attracted many followers to continue the research. In actual studies, however, only research on everyday utterance s are much more preferred, and most of the examples are created by the researchers themselves, who would subconsciously, at least in part, select the needed utterances and contexts to cater to their own requirements. Very few people once researched a specific literary work from the perspect