护理干预对腹腔引流管安全管理效果观察.docVIP

护理干预对腹腔引流管安全管理效果观察 　　【摘要】 目的 探讨采用护理干预措施对腹腔引流管安全管理的效果。方法 318例留置腹腔引流管的患者， 随机分为对照组（158例）和观察组（160例）， 对照组采用常规护理方法， 观察组在常规护理方法的基础上采取综合护理干预措施。比较两组患者腹腔引流管脱出率、胶布过敏率、患者对引流管护理的满意度。结果 观察组腹腔引流管脱出率、胶布过敏率均为0， 明显低于对照组的7.59%、11.39%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。观察组护理满意度为98.75%， 高于对照组的90.51%， 差异具有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 采取护理干预措施能明显降低腹腔引流管的脱管率， 大大提高腹腔引流管管理的安全性， 明显提升患者对护理的满意度。 　　【关键词】 护理干预；腹腔引流管；安全管理 　　DOI：10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.33.087 　　Observation of effect by nursing intervention for safety management of peritoneal cavity drainage tube ZHANG Li-ping. Nanshi Affiliated Hospital of Henan University， Nanyang 473000， China 　　【Abstract】 Objective To investigate effect by effect by nursing intervention for safety management of peritoneal cavity drainage tube. Methods A total of 318 patients with peritoneal cavity drainage tube were randomly divided into control group （158 cases） and observation group （160 cases）. The control group received conventional nursing measures， and the observation group received additional comprehensive nursing intervention measures. Comparison was made on detach rate of peritoneal cavity drainage tube， plaster allergy rate， and satisfaction degree of drainage tube nursing between the two groups. Results The observation group had detach rate of peritoneal cavity drainage tube and plaster allergy rate both as 0， which were obviously lower than 7.59% and 11.39% in the control group， and the difference had statistical significance （P0.05）. The observation group had higher nursing satisfaction degree as 98.75% than 90.51% in the control group， and the difference had statistical significance （P0.05）. Conclusion Implement of nursing intervention measures can remarkably reduce detach rate of peritoneal cavity drainage tube and improve safety of peritoneal cavity drainage tube management， and it can obviously improve nursing satisfaction degree by patients. 　　【Key words】 Nursing intervention； Peritoneal cavity drainage tube； Safety management 　　腹腔引流管是外科医生根据手术需要， 在腹腔内手术野下方放置引