护理干预对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后切口感染影响.docVIP

护理干预对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后切口感染影响.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理干预对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后切口感染影响

护理干预对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后切口感染影响   [摘要] 目的 分析护理干预对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后切口感染风险的影响,改进护理措施。 方法 回顾性分析2011年4月―2014年4月该院收治的57例骶骨脊索瘤患者临床资料,将患者分类为观察组和对照组,观察组在接受负压引流治疗期间初实施常规护理外、还进行了如下加强护理干预,对照组患者在接受常规引流治疗期间实施常规护理,对引流液量和感染率进行数据分析。 结果 两组引流量第1 d差异无统计学意义(P0.05);第3 d、第7 d的引流量负压引流组明显高于常规引流组(P0.05)。观察组与对照组阳性率相比,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.82,P0.01),观察组的感染阳性率低于对照组。结论 对骶骨脊索瘤患者术后第三天开始应用负压引流,能降低切口感染风险。   [关键词] 骶骨脊索瘤;感染;护理   [中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)02(b)-0147-03   Effects of Nursing Intervention on the Postoperative Incision Infection in Patients with Sacral Chordoma   YANG Guangyu ZHANG Junjuan ZHU Shichao   Department of Orthopedics, Henan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, China   [Abstract] Objective To analyze the effect of nursing intervention on the postoperative incision infection in patients with sacral chordoma so as to improve the nursing measures. Methods 57 patients with sacral chordoma admitted from April 2011 to Arpril 2014 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group was given the strengthened nursing intervention as well as the conventional nursing during the period of negative pressure drainage treatment. The control group were given the conventional nursing during the conventional drainage treatment. And the data of drainage fluid volume and the infection rate of the two groups were analyzed. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the drainage volume on the first day between the two groups(P0.05); but the drainage volume of the negative pressure drainage group on the third and seventh day was much more than that of the conventional drainage group, respectively(P0.05). The difference in positive rate between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2=6.82, P0.01), the infection positive rate of the observation group was lower than that of the control group. Conclusion For patients with sacral chordoma surgery, negative pressure drainage used on the third

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档