- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
消化系统肿瘤化疗应用PICC导管护理效果探讨
消化系统肿瘤化疗应用PICC导管护理效果探讨
[摘要]目的 探讨分析消化系统肿瘤化疗应用PICC导管的护理质量和服务效果。方法 该研究随机选取2011年3月―2014年11月在该院接受消化系统肿瘤化疗的患者90例作为研究对象进行研究,将90例患者随机分为两组,实验组和对照组,实验组患者45例,对照组患者45例。对照组采用常规护理,实验组采用PICC导管护理,观察两组患者护理效果和患者不良反应出现几率。 结果 实验组患者的护理有效率为95.56%,对照组患者有效率为80%,P0.05表示差异有统计学意义。实验组出现不良护理有5例,发生几率为5.56%,对照组患者出现不良护理有20例,发生几率为44.44%。实验组患者护理满意度为95.56%,实验组患者护理满意度为73.53%。两组患者满意度和并发症发生几率差异有统计学意义,P0.05。 结论 PICC导管的应用,可以避免刺激性并发症,避免了穿刺为患者带来的痛苦,有效提高了患者的护理满意度。
[关键词] 消化系统肿瘤;PICC导管;护理体会
[中图分类号] R473.73 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)08(c)-0155-03
Observation on the Effect of Nursing for Digestive Cancer Patients Treated by Chemotherapy with PICC Catheter
HUANG Li-min
Oncology Department, Haimen People’s Hospital, Haimen, Jiangsu Province, 226100 China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate and analyze the quality and effect of nursing for digestive cancer patients treated by chemotherapy with PICC catheter. Methods 90 cases with digestive cancer underwent chemotherapy in our hospital from March 2011 to November 2014 were selected for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group and the control group with 45 cases in each. The control group was given the conventional nursing, and the experimental group was given PICC catheter nursing. And the nursing efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results The nursing response rate of the experimental group was 95.56%, and that of the control group was 80%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, P0.05. Adverse nursing events occurred in 5 cases in the experimental group with the incidence of 5.56%, and those occurred in 20 cases in the control group with the incidence of 44.44%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, P0.05. The patients’ satisfaction with nursing in the experimental group was 95.56%, and that in the control group was 73.53%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, P
文档评论(0)