弹塑性断裂力学EPFM.PPT

The J-Integral LABORATORY MEASUREMENT Double-edge-notched tension (DENT) The J-Integral J and CTOD For linear elastic conditions, the relationship between CTOD and G is clear. Since J = G for linear elastic material behavior, these equations also describe the relationship between CTOD and J in the limit of small-scale yielding. That is Let us define a contour Γ along the boundary of this zone. If the damage zone is long and slender, i.e., if r δ, the first term in the J contour integral vanishes because dy = 0. Since the only surface tractions within r are in the y direction, ny = 1 and nx = nz = 0. Thus the J integral is given by Let us define a new coordinate system with the origin at the tip of the strip-yield zone: X = r ? x. For a fixed d, σyy and uy depend only on X, provided ρ is small compared to the in-plane dimensions of the cracked body. The J integral becomes The J-Integral J and CTOD where d = 2uy (X = r). Since the strip-yield model assumes σyy=σYS within the plastic zone, the J-CTOD relationship is given by The J-Integral J and CTOD: HHR For HHR model The displacements near the crack tip are as follows: Where ~u is a dimensionless function of Θ and n For the 90°intercept definition of CTOD The CTOD is obtained by evaluating ux and uy at r = r* and Θ = π: The J-Integral J and CTOD: HHR Setting d = 2uy(r*, π) leads to The J-Integral J and CTOD: HHR Shih, C.F. ‘‘Relationship between the J-Integral and the Crack Opening Displacement for Stationary and Extending Cracks.’’ Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, Vol. 29, 1981, pp. 305–326. The J-Integral J and CRACK-GROWTH RESISTANCE CURVES Many materials with high toughness do not fail catastrophically at a particular value of J or CTOD. Rather, these materials display a rising R curve, where J and CTOD increase with crack growth. In metals, a rising R curve is normally associated with the growth and coalescence of microvoids. The J-Integral J and CRACK-GROWTH RESISTANCE CURVES While initiation to