生化检查对人工髋关节感染诊断价值.docVIP

生化检查对人工髋关节感染诊断价值.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
生化检查对人工髋关节感染诊断价值

生化检查对人工髋关节感染诊断价值   [摘要] 目的 评价分析使用血沉及CRP两指标诊断筛选人工髋关节感染的临床应用价值,为临床推广应用提供依据。方法 回顾分析2013年11月―2015年3月间患者的临床症状、体征、所患疾病史等。结果146例采用人工髋关节翻修术进行治疗的患者中,人工髋关节感染的19例患者中,11例血沉检测为阳性,8例阴性;13例CRP阳性,6例阴性,血沉检测阳性合并CRP阴性患者共3例,血沉检测阴性合并CRP阳性患者共6例。 结论 同时使用血沉及CRP作为行翻修术患者的临床评价及检查指标,其临床漏诊率低,准确率高。   [关键词] 血沉;CRP;人工髋关节感染   [中图分类号] R722.12 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)04(a)-0058-02   [Abstract] Objective To evaluate and analyze the clinical application value of two indexes such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP in diagnosis and screening of hip arthroplasty infection and provide basis for the clinical promotion and application. Methods The clinical symptoms, signs and diseases histories of patients treated from November 2013 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate test results, CRP levels, intraoperative tissue cultivation, x-ray film, joint fluid?stab cultivation and case test results of patients were comprehensively analyzed. Results In the 146 cases of patients with artifical hip joint revision , the hip arthroplasty infection was in 19 cases, among them, the ESR test was positive in 11 cases and negative in 8 cases, CRP was positive in 13 cases and negative in 6 cases, the positive ESR test combined with negative CRP was in 3 cases, the negative ESR test combined with positive CRP was in 6 cases, in the 127 cases with aseptic loosening, the ESR test was positive in 18 cases and negative in 109 cases, CRP was positive in 14 cases and negative in 113 cases, the specificity and sensitivity of CRP for patients with hip arthroplasty infection were respectively [88.90 ± 1.96 (0.029) %] and [69.15 ± 1.96 (0.108)%], the clinical diagnosis accuracy rate was [19.02 ± 1.96 (0.028) %], the specificity and sensitivity of ESR indexes for hip arthroplasty infection were respectively [84.26 ± 1.96 (0.029) %] and [56.88 ± 1.96 (0.109) %], the clinical diagnosis accuracy rate was [19.98 ± 1.96 (0.031) %]. Conclusion The simultaneous use of ESR and CRP

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档