- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜与开腹上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术疗效研究
腹腔镜与开腹上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术疗效研究
[摘要] 目的 比较腹腔镜与开腹上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术的治疗效果,探讨两种手术方式的临床应用价值。 方法 选择2010年1月~2014年1月收治的上消化道溃疡穿孔患者共72例,随机分为腹腔镜手术组38例,开腹手术组34例,观察并记录两组患者手术时间、术后引流量、排气时间、术后并发症等资料并进行比较。 结果 腹腔镜组患者手术时间为(55.1±7.7)h、术中出血量为(14.2±3.8)mL、排气时间为(22.3±6.9)h,开腹组患者手术时间为(83.5±13.2)h、术中出血量为(33.7±5.4)mL、排气时间为(63.7±16.6)h,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。腹腔镜组患者术后并发症的发生率为5.3%,明显低于开腹组组患者的29.4%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 相比开腹手术,腹腔镜上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术具有操作简单、创伤小、术后康复快等优势,值得临床推广应用。
[关键词] 腹腔镜;开腹手术;上消化道溃疡穿孔修补术;疗效
[中图分类号] R656.6 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2015)06-141-03
The research on the efficacy of laparoscopic and open peptic ulcer perforation repair
MAI Changwen CHEN Daizhong LIU Shuhuai
Department of General Surgery, Chencun Hospital Affiliated to the First Peoples Hospital of Shunde District, Foshan 523800, China
[Abstract] Objective Digestive tract ulcer perforation repair of the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic and open on the two kinds of operation mode, explore the value of clinical application. Methods A total of 72 patients with perforation of digestive ulcer in 2010 January to 2014 January were selected on, were randomly divided into laparoscopic operation group 38 cases, 34 cases of abdominal operation group, observe and record the two groups of patients with operation time, postoperative drainage, exhaust time, postoperative complications and other data and comparison. Results The operation time for patients in the laparoscopic group(55.1±7.7)h, the amount of hemorrhage of(14.2±3.8)mL, the exhaust time of (22.3±6.9)h, the open group in operation time for(83.5±13.2)h, the amount of hemorrhage of(33.7±5.4)mL, time (63.7±16.6)h, with a significant difference between two groups(P0.05). Patients in the laparoscopic group the incidence of postoperative complications was 5.3%, significantly lower than the open group of 29.4% patients, with significant difference(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with open operation, ulcer perforation repair has the advantages of simple operation, less trauma, faster post
原创力文档


文档评论(0)