- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析
股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析
[摘要] 目的 探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗老年患者股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。 方法 选择2010年10月~2012年10月我院就诊的股骨粗隆间骨折70例老年患者临床资料进行回顾性分析,根据治疗方法不同分为观察组与对照组,每组各35例,观察组采用PFNA治疗,对照组采用DHS治疗。观察比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量,住院时间及并发症情况,并进行术后髋关节功能评分比较。 结果 两组患者平均手术时间、出血量、住院时间及并发症发病情况比较,观察组患者均明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的Harris评分优良率为97.1%明显高于对照组的88.4%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折相比DHS固定手术具有术中出血量少、手术时间短、恢复快、治疗效果显著的优点,值得临床广泛应用
[关键词] 股骨近端防旋髓内钉;老年患者;股骨粗隆间骨折
[中图分类号] R683.42 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 2095-0616(2013)14-174-02
Clinical effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture
YANG Xiujin
Department of Orthopaedics,Chongqing Xiushan County Peoples Hospital,Chongqing 409900,China
[Abstract] Objective To study the clinical effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Methods The clinical data of 70 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture who were in hospital from October 2010 to October 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into the control group and the experiment group according to the treatment method,with 35 cases in each group. The experiment group was given PFNA and the control group was treated by DHS. The operation time,intraoperative bleeding,hospitalization time and complications of two groups were observed and compared,and the scores of hip joint function after operation of two groups were compared. Results The average operation time,bleeding volume,the incidence of complications and hospitalization time comparison in the observation group were significantly less than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.05). The excellent and good rate of Harris score in observation group was 97.1%,significantly higher than that in control group 88.4%,the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion PFNA in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture is less
文档评论(0)