腹腔镜下胆总管探查术与内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石临床效果比较分析.docVIP

腹腔镜下胆总管探查术与内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石临床效果比较分析.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜下胆总管探查术与内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石临床效果比较分析

腹腔镜下胆总管探查术与内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石临床效果比较分析   【摘要】 目的:观察分析腹腔镜下胆总管探查术与内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的临床效果。方法:选择本院2014年6月-2016年2月?M行治疗的120例胆总管结石患者作为研究对象,采用随机方法将其分为研究组和对照组,每组各60例。研究组患者采取腹腔镜下胆总管探查术治疗,对照组患者采取内窥镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗,比较分析两组患者的操作成功率、一期手术治愈率、残余结石与病变率、住院时间、围术期间并发症发生情况。结果:治疗后,研究组患者操作成功率为98.3%,对照组患者操作成功率为96.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。研究组患者一期手术治愈率为83.3%,对照组患者一期手术治愈率为48.3%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:胆总管结石患者通过腹腔镜下胆总管探查术和内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗,具有较高的操作成功率,同时住院时间短等优点,但腹腔镜下胆总管探查术具有并发症发生率低,残余病变率低的优势,故临床上对胆总管结石患者优先选用腹腔镜下胆总管探查术治疗。   【关键词】 腹腔镜; 胆总管探查术; 括约肌切开术; 胆总管结石   【Abstract】 Objective:To observe and analyze the clinical effects of of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of common bile duct stones.Method:120 patients with common bile duct stones and who accepted treatments in our hospital from June 2014 to February 2016 were selected as the research objects, according to the random method they were divided into two groups,60 patients in each group.The study group was treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,while the control group was treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy.Then,the success rate of operation, the cure rate of the first stage operation, the residual stones,the rate of the disease,hospitalization time and incidence of complications during perioperative period of two groups were comparative analyzed.Result:After treatment,the success rate of study group was 98.3%, while the control group was 96.7%,the difference was no statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:The laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in treatment of patients with common bile duct stones,which has higher success rate.At the same time,hospitalization time is short and has other advantages,but the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration has the advantage of low incidence of complications and low rate of residual disease.Therefore,the clinical treatment of patients with common bile duct stones were preferred lap

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档