腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤优质护理方式及应用意义评定.docVIP

腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤优质护理方式及应用意义评定.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤优质护理方式及应用意义评定

腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤优质护理方式及应用意义评定   [摘要] 目的 探?在腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤中实施优质护理的方式及意义。方法 方便选取2016年1月―2017年1月期间在该院接受治疗的卵巢肿瘤患者作为研究对象,共98例,通过数字编号和随机分组方式分为两组,每组各49例,均采用腹腔镜治疗方式,其中对照组实施常规护理干预。而观察组在对照组患者护理的基础上实施优质护理干预,对两组患者的心理状态改善、生存质量及并发症发生率进行比较分析。 结果 护理前两组患者焦虑评分、抑郁评分、生活质量评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);护理后,观察组焦虑评分(42.02±3.35)分、抑郁评分(40.27±3.75)分均显著低于对照组(49.69±4.01)分和(48.61±4.21)分,而生活质量评分(79.69±4.26)分则显著高于对照组(62.24±4.74)分,(P0.05)。观察组并发症发生率2.04%显著低于对照组14.28%,护理满意度97.96%显著高于对照组81.63%(P0.05)。结论 在腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤中实施优质护理对改善预后和保证治疗安全性有明显的效果,利于进一步改善护患关系,提高患者护理满意度,值得推广应用。   [关键词] 腹腔镜;卵巢肿瘤;优质护理   [中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2018)01(a)-0163-03   Quality Nursing Methods and Significance of Laparoscopic Treatment of Ovarian Tumors   FEI Xiao-pei   Department of Gynecology, Pizhou People’s Hospital, Pizhou, Jiangsu Province, 221300 China   [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to explore the ways and significance of high quality nursing in laparoscopic treatment of ovarian tumors. Methods A total of 98 patients with ovarian cancer treated in the hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were convenient enrolled in this study. Through the number and random grouping method, they were divided into two groups, with 49 cases in each group, treated with laparoscopy, in which the control group to implement routine nursing intervention. And the observation group on the basis of the control group implementing the quality care intervention, the two groups of patients with mental state improvement, quality of life and the incidence of complications were analyzed. Results There were no significant differences in anxiety scores, depression scores and quality of life scores between the two groups before treatment (P0.05). After nursing, the anxiety score was (42.02±3.35)points and the depression score was (40.27±3.75)points, lower than the control group of (49.69±4.01)points and (48.61±4.21)points, while the quality of life score was (79.69±4.26)points, which was significantly higher than that of the control group of (62.24±

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档