- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
超声联合CT诊断甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴结转移临床价值
超声联合CT诊断甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴结转移临床价值
[摘要] 目的 探讨超声(ultrasound,US)联合计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)对甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴结转移的临床诊断价值。 方法 选取2013年6月~2015年6月在我院行甲状腺癌手术治疗、术后病理证实为甲状腺乳头状癌98例,术前均行颈部B超和CT检查,术后行HE染色、组织病理检查,进行相互比较。 结果 根据“每水平”分析,US/CT与US相比能显著提高颈侧区和颈总区转移淋巴结的检测准确度(P=0.032,P=0.028);US/CT与CT相比并未能显示出优越的诊断价值(P0.05)。根据“每人”分析,US与CT的准确率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);US/CT与US之间的准确率比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.047);而US/CT与CT之间的准确率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。影像学预测转移组与未转移组准确率对比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 US/CT对PTC患者颈侧区转移淋巴结的检测优于US,对术前US怀疑有颈侧区淋巴结转移者,可进一步行CT检查,以决定是否行颈侧区淋巴结清扫。
[关键词] 甲状腺乳头状癌;淋巴结转移;超声;计算机断层扫描
[中图分类号] R576 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)34-0092-04
Clinical value of combined ultrasound and CT for detecting cervical metastatic lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
ZHANG Yi1 DONG Jianda1 JI Jingzhang2 ZHENG Zhiqiang1
1.Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China; 2.Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325000, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the value of ultrasonography and CT in diagnosis of the cervical lymph nodes metastasis of thyroid carcinoma. Methods From June 2013 to June 2015, 98 cases of thyroid cancer patients were selected as the research object patients, who confirmed as papillary thyroid carcinoma by pathology. All patients were evaluated by ultrasonography and CT examination before surgery. And then examined by pathologicl HE staining and pathology method after operation. Results The accuracy of detection of metastatic nodes by US/CT was higher than By US at the level of central and lateral neck with “per level” analysis (P=0.032 and P=0.028). Detected by US/CT was no significant difference of diagnostic values than by CT. With “per person” analysis, there were no significant differences of accuracy between US and CT or between US/CT and CT (P0.05). Compared with the group without metastasis, the accuracy of the imaging prediction was statistically significant(P0.05). Conclusion US/CT combination is found to
文档评论(0)