- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
连续臂丛麻醉用于上肢手术及其术后镇痛应用
连续臂丛麻醉用于上肢手术及其术后镇痛应用
[摘要] 目的 对上肢手术与其术后镇痛应用连续臂丛麻醉的临床疗效及意义进行探究。 方法 整群选取2014年1月―2014年12月该院拟行上肢手术患者并且ASAI~II级的70例进行随机分组,对照组35例:采用常规臂丛麻醉,术后芬太尼为主的皮下镇痛;研究组35例:行连续臂丛神经阻滞,术后接罗派卡为主的镇痛泵;观察两组麻醉效果、臂丛神经各支麻醉阻滞情况、术后VAS镇痛评分、Ramesay镇静评分、不良反应情况。结果 研究组效果明显优于对照组,6个皮区运动和感觉神经阻滞差异无统计学意义,研究组VAS镇痛评分与对照组差异无统计学意义,Ramesay镇静评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义;术后对照组发生不良反应6例,研究组1例,两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。 结论 上肢手术应用连续臂丛麻醉效果确切、术后镇痛、镇静效果满意、不良反应少。
[关键词] 上肢手术;连续臂丛麻醉;镇痛
[中图分类号] R8 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2015)09(b)-0033-02
[Abstract] Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and value of continuous brachial plexus anesthesia in upper extremity surgery and postoperative analgesia. Methods 70 patients who were in ASAI-II level and underwent upper extremity surgery in this hospital between January 2014 and December 2014 were randomized to control group and study group. The 35 in the control group were given conventional brachial plexus anesthesia combined with postoperative subcutaneous analgesia by fentanyl, while the other 35 in the study group underwent continuous brachial plexus anesthesia followed by the mainly use of ropivacaine hydrochloride via analgesia pump. We observe the anesthesia effect, postoperative VAS pain score, anesthetic blocking of 6 nerves, Ramesay sedation score, adverse reactions. Results The anesthesia effect was obvious better in the study group than in the control group; there were no statistically significant differences in motor nerve block and sensory nerve block between 6 skin areas; there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative VAS pain score between the two groups; the Ramesay sedation score was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group with statistical difference; there were 6 cases of adverse reaction in the control group and 1 case in the study group, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Continuous brachial plexus anesthesia applied in upper extremity surgery and postoperative analgesia can produce exact and
文档评论(0)